My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-19-SPC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2019
>
07-10-19-SPC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2019 10:47:02 AM
Creation date
7/5/2019 10:41:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 5, 2019 3 <br /> <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Gehrig opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Vijums asked if the additional driveway would tie into the existing driveway. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Strain reported the new driveway would tie into the existing driveway and <br />would be the same material type. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth commented on the required land disturbance permit and asked if the <br />structure proposed would encroach on any wetlands. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Strain explained this site did not have any wetlands. <br /> <br />City Planner Mrosla reported the City Engineer had reviewed this application and once formal <br />plans were submitted staff would review the information again to make sure nothing was <br />impacted outside the area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth asked if the exterior finish on the accessory structure would match the <br />home. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Strain stated the applicant would be siding the accessory structure to <br />make it look similar to the principle structure. <br /> <br />City Planner Mrosla suggested a condition for approval be added to read: The proposed <br />accessory structure shall compliment the principle structure in color, if materials are unable to <br />match. <br /> <br />Commissioner Vijums asked if water would be run to the accessory structure. <br /> <br />City Planner Mrosla stated water would not be run to the garage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth moved and Commissioner Vijums seconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 19-007 for a Site Plan Review at 4101 Gale Circle, <br />based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the four (4) <br />conditions in the June 5, 2019, Report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />B. Planning Case 19-001; Brausen Automotive Repair – Site Plan Review and Final <br />Planned Unit Development – Public Hearing <br /> <br />City Planner Mrosla stated Brausen Automotive Repair has been serving the community for <br />over 20 years. The existing motorized vehicle service center consists of six (6) repair bays in <br />their garage. Also onsite is approximately a 3,000 square foot service station, with five (5) fuel <br />islands and an associated carwash. The Applicant is requesting to remove the existing service <br />station and carwash. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.