Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — AUGUST 12, 2019 3 <br />Mayor Grant supported moving forward with this project given the fact the County wants to <br />move forward with this improvement project. He noted the City had fund set aside for this <br />project. <br />Councilmember McClung asked who the City has used in the past for its feasibility reports. <br />City Administrator Perrault explained the City has used SEH, Kimley-Horn, WSB, and Bolton <br />& Menk. <br />Councilmember McClung recommended staff speak with these companies and request an RFP <br />for the project. <br />Councilmember Holden supported staff pursuing several bids for the feasibility report as well. <br />Council consensus was to direct staff to request bids for the feasibility report and bring back an <br />order for a feasibility report at the August 26, 2019 City Council meeting. <br />B. Neighborhood Meeting Notification Discussion <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained at their May 16, 2011 <br />meeting the City Council approved the Land Use Application Public Notification Policy. The <br />policy requires staff to notify residents within a given distance from the subject parcel where the <br />development is occurring by mail of upcoming meeting Planning Commission and City Council <br />meetings. The notification mailing distance is determined by whether the planning case requires a <br />public hearing, and if the project is large and has special circumstances. Staff has been utilizing <br />the Land Use Application Public Notification Policy mailing distances when notifying residents of <br />neighborhood meeting. The rationale for utilizing this policy is that the intent of a neighborhood <br />meeting is to reach the same people who will be notified of the public hearing. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated the intent of a neighborhood <br />meeting is to allow the applicant to garner feedback from those directly impacted by the project <br />and allow them to make improvements to reduce concerns and impacts. In most communities, <br />neighborhood meetings are generally held for applications for preliminary plats, conditional use <br />permits, planned unit developments and/or rezoning proposals that are located adjacent to or <br />within a residential zoning district. The intent of the neighborhood meeting is to expand and <br />enhance the distribution of information to the residents directly impacted by a development <br />proposal. However, different communities have varying policies when it comes to neighborhood <br />meetings notification requirements. A review of five (5) adjacent communities was reviewed with <br />the Council. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported cities generally have the <br />same requirements when it comes to neighborhood meetings. Only Vadnais Heights and <br />Roseville require neighborhood meetings for certain application types. All cities provide <br />addresses to the applicants for mailings. The majority of cities above require notices to be mailed <br />to all properties within 350 feet of the subject property, and then allow staff to use their discretion <br />to expand the notification area if deemed necessary. None of the cities surveyed post <br />