Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — AUGUST 12, 2019 7 <br />with Edina, staff intends on having future discussions on setbacks, neighborhood characteristics, <br />and infill construction management. <br />Councilmember Scott asked if additional language should be considered for trees that are <br />damaged during a storm. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier stated this could be considered. Further discussion ensued <br />regarding tree loss and the percentage of significant tree loss that should be allowed. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she did not believe the current clearcutting language made any <br />sense because a developer could clear two out of three lots at this time within the Ordinance. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla indicated the language within the <br />Ordinance could be strengthened to address clearcutting concerns. He noted the infill and erosion <br />control language could also be amended. He stated he could report back to the Council after <br />meeting with the City of Edina to see how this City addressed these items. <br />Councilmember McClung indicated he would like to develop a little bit of tooth on how to <br />address these matters and for there to be a clear penalty in place. <br />E. Code Enforcement Discussion <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained a general question was <br />raised if the City's ordinance relating to code enforcement needs to be clearer for enforcement, or <br />if it is sufficient. Community Development staff with the City's prosecuting attorney (Kelly and <br />Lemmons) discussed the City's ordinance and how effective it is with regards to code <br />enforcement. Staff and the attorney also discussed a specific complaint regarding cars and <br />recreational vehicle (RV) parked on a property, as well as a non -conforming fence. Staff and the <br />attorney agreed the current ordinance is sufficient for general code enforcement, and does not <br />need further clarification at this time. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated however, every code <br />enforcement case has its own unique set situations and complexities. Generally, if a violation of <br />the code is found to exist, a letter will be sent which outlines the steps that need to be taken to <br />correct the violation. In many instances, residents are simply unaware of the Code and correct the <br />situation immediately. In the event the correction is not made in a reasonable amount of time, <br />staff has numerous means to resolve the matter. Below are common code enforcement issues that <br />our inspectors encounter with regards to vehicle and RV parking on residential lots. <br />Code Section: 800.03 - Parking Regulations <br />• Prohibited Parking Areas. In all residential districts, parking shall be prohibited on any <br />area of private property except on designated driveways or parking lots. <br />• Parking in Driveways. In all residential districts, there shall be no more than four vehicles <br />parked on a driveway. <br />Code Section: 1325.12 — Recreational Vehicle, Utility Trailer, Riding Lawn Mower, and <br />Watercraft Outdoor Storage: <br />