My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-19 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2019
>
10-09-19 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2020 9:42:25 AM
Creation date
1/3/2020 9:42:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 9, 2019 11 <br /> <br />General Findings: <br />1. The property at 1314 Cannon Avenue is located in the R-1 Single Family Residential <br />Zoning District. <br />2. The existing single-family residential dwelling was built prior to the existing zoning code <br />and is a nonconforming structure because it encroaches into the required side yard <br />setbacks on either side of the property. <br />3. The property owners have requested a variance in order to construct an addition that <br />would remain flush with the side of the dwelling and would maintain the same setback as <br />the existing structure <br />4. The proposed addition would meet all other minimum setback requirements for the R-1 <br />District. <br />5. The proposed addition meets the minimum lot coverage requirements, maximum building <br />height requirement, and floor area ratio requirement for the R-1 District, as indicated by <br />the plans submitted by the Applicant. <br />6. The proposed development would not encroach on any flood plains, wetlands, or <br />easements. <br />7. The proposed development is not expected to impact any significant trees on the property. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated staff recommends approval of <br />the Variance with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the <br />conditions of approval. <br />2. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require <br />review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. <br />3. A Building Permit shall be required prior to commencement of construction. <br />4. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. <br />5. The proposed structure finish shall complement the existing structure onsite. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the options available to <br />the Planning Commission on this matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Gehrig opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones stated this would be a nice addition to the home and asked if the applicant <br />had spoken to his neighbors. <br /> <br />Chris Gross, North River Remodeling, stated his client has a letter from the next door neighbor <br />noting the neighbor approved of the project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones requested a copy of this letter be provided to staff. <br /> <br />Chair Gehrig questioned what the finished exterior would be for the new addition.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.