My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-04-19 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2019
>
12-04-19 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2020 9:51:55 AM
Creation date
1/3/2020 9:51:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for December 4th, 2019 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2019\19-015 - 3244 Sandeen Road\Memos Reports Page 5 of 6 <br />3.Economic Consideration. Economic consideration alone does not constitute a practical <br />difficulty. <br />The proposed variance is not based on economic consideration. <br />4.Access to Sunlight. Inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems shall be <br />considered a practical difficulty. <br />A solar energy system is not proposed. <br />Findings of Fact <br />The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application <br />would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the <br />aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following findings for consideration: <br />General Findings: <br />1.City Staff received a land use application for a request to build a new single family dwelling <br />at the Subject Property 3244 Sandeen Road. <br />2.Single-family detached dwelling is a permitted use in the R-2 district. <br />3.The Subject Property is currently a vacant lot in the R-2. <br />4.The Subject Property is non-conforming with the R-2 districts standards for minimum lot <br />width and area requirements. <br />5.The subject parcel is encumbered by a bluff and a 20 foot bluff impact zone. <br />6.The proposed development of the subject parcel would conform to all other requirements <br />and standards of the R-2 district and Shoreland Management Regulations. <br />7. The proposed development would not encroach on the bluff or any flood plains, wetlands, <br />or easements. <br />8.A variance may be granted if enforcement of a provision in the zoning ordinance would <br />cause the landowner practical difficulties. <br />9.Variances are only permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent <br />of the ordinance. <br />Options and Motion Language <br />Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. The Planning <br />Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to support <br />their recommendation for approval or denial. <br />•Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case <br />19-015 for a Variance at 3244 Sandeen Road, based on the findings of fact and the <br />submitted plans, as amended by the conditions below: <br />1. A Building Permit shall be issued prior to commencement of construction. <br />2.The proposed building shall conform to all other standards and regulations in the City <br />Code.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.