Laserfiche WebLink
February 28, 2020 <br />Page 12 <br />K:\014908-000\Traffic\Traffic Study\Lake Valentine Road Study.docx <br />Table 1. Year 2020 Mid-Block Signal Only Operations Summary <br /> <br /> <br />Year 2020 Mid-Block Signal and West Access Realignment Condition <br />To represent the Year 2020 Mid-Block Signal and West Access Realignment Conditions, this <br />scenario includes the mid-block signal as described previously and realignment of the West <br />Parking Access to create a conventional intersection with the West School Access. The existing <br />lane geometry, access, and traffic control at the remaining existing intersections was not <br />modified. With the realignment of the West Parking Access, vehicles are now able to use this <br />access without creating left-turn issues as can be shown in the existing condition. Organized <br />queueing space will also be provided so vehicles aren’t weaving through the parking lot to form a <br />line when exiting the lot during the PM peak hour. The results of the 2020 Mid-Block Signal and <br />West Access Realignment Condition traffic operations analysis are summarized in Table 2. Like <br />the 2020 Mid-Block Signal Only Condition, the mid-block signal was modeled with a 45-second <br />cycle length, giving 24 seconds to the pedestrian phase and 21 seconds to the vehicle phase. <br />Figure 8 displays the 2020 Mid-Block Signal and West Access Realignment Traffic Volumes. <br />Parking lot trips were redistributed based on their origin and destination. Trips coming from/going <br />to the west on Lake Valentine Road were assigned to the West Parking Access and trips coming <br />from/going to the east were assigned to the East Parking Access. This is expected to represent <br />actual distribution because it will keep these drivers from driving through the mid-block signal <br />where they would likely have to stop. As in the 2020 Mid-Block Signal, all pedestrians were <br />relocated to the mid-block signal to cross Lake Valentine Road. As Table 2 shows the average <br />delay for each peak hour, it is assumed that the peak 15-minute periods will experience slightly <br />higher delays than shown. <br /> <br />Left Through Right Left Through Right <br />NB 10 (B) 0 (A) 7 (A)7 (A) 0 (A) 3 (A) <br />WB 5 (A) 2 (A) 0 (A)3 (A) 2 (A) 0 (A) <br />SB 0 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A)0 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A) <br />EB 0 (A) 2 (A) 1 (A)0 (A) 1 (A) 0 (A) <br />NB 0 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A)0 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A) <br />WB 0 (A) 11 (B) 0 (A)0 (A) 10 (B) 0 (A) <br />SB 0 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A)0 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A) <br />EB 0 (A) 12 (B) 0 (A)0 (A) 10 (B) 0 (A) <br />WB 0 (A) 3 (A) 1 (A)1 (A) 1 (A) 0 (A) <br />SB 13 (B) 0 (A) 0 (A)7 (A) 0 (A) 4 (A) <br />EB 5 (A) 2 (A) 1 (A)3 (A) 2 (A) 0 (A) <br />NB 12 (B) 0 (A) 4 (A)6 (A) 4 (A) 4 (A) <br />WB 3 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A)2 (A) 0 (A) 0 (A) <br />SB 5 (A) 0 (A) 4 (A)8 (A) 5 (A) 4 (A) <br />EB 3 (A) 1 (A) 1 (A)2 (A) 1 (A) 1 (A) <br />NB 10 (B) 0 (A) 3 (A)8 (A) 0 (A) 4 (A) <br />WB 4 (A) 1 (A) 0 (A)3 (A) 1 (A) 0 (A) <br />EB 0 (A) 1 (A) 0 (A)0 (A) 1 (A) 0 (A) <br />* Delay measured in seconds per vehicleThru-StopSouth Parking Access & <br />Lake Valentine Rd 2 (A)2 (A) <br />Intersection <br />ControlLocation Approach Intersection <br />Delay* (LOS) <br />Intersection <br />Delay* (LOS) <br />5 (A) <br />PM Peak <br />Movement Delay* (LOS) <br />2 (A)Thru-StopAM Peak <br />Movement Delay* (LOS) <br />West School Access & <br />Lake Valentine Rd Signalized1 (A)Thru-StopEast Parking Access & <br />Lake Valentine Rd 2 (A)3 (A)Thru-StopBus Parking Access/Janet <br />Court & Lake Valentine <br />Rd <br />Lake Valentine Rd & Ped <br />Crossing 12 (B)10 (B) <br />1 (A)