My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-2020 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2020
>
04-15-2020 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2020 10:41:19 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 10:39:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 5, 2020 6 <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented the City’s Shoreline <br />Ordinance was not approved until 2010. <br /> <br />Chair Gehrig questioned if staff had visited the site and if so, were there any concerns about any <br />extended deck interfering with sight lines. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported staff has visited the site <br />numerous times. He explained views and sight lines were not to be take into consideration for <br />variance requests but rather the zoning level only. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth asked what the width of this property was. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann reported the lot was 45 feet at its narrowest point. He stated the <br />lot was a legally non-conforming property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth reviewed the comments the City had received from the neighbors <br />noting there was concerns regarding views and sight lines. He stated five and half feet was not a <br />great deal of space and he wondered how this small of a variance would inconvenience the <br />neighbors. He anticipated the neighbor’s six foot solid fence blocked more views than the <br />proposed deck would. He explained he supported the proposed deck and found it to be <br />reasonable. <br /> <br />Commissioner Subramanian questioned if the owners would consider redesigning the deck to <br />maintain a length that did not require a variance. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla deferred this question to the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />Kurt Curtin, Curtin & Sons Construction, stated he was representing the applicant. He reported <br />the deck would not be functional if it were angled. He noted this was an awkward lot that was <br />developed prior to all of the current City Code. He explained the proposed deck would have <br />clear glass railings so as not to obstruct any views. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth asked how long the applicant has lived in the home. <br /> <br />Justin Brown, 3159 Shoreline Lane, stated he has lived in the home since 2013. He explained <br />the home was owned between six of his family members. He reported the deck was being <br />proposed to provide more space for the family when recreating at the lake home. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth questioned if Mr. Brown was aware of the existing restrictions and <br />setbacks when he purchased the home. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown explained he looked at replacing the deck last year after the existing trusses began to <br />give out. He stated the new deck would be made out of composite materials. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth inquired if Mr. Brown had spoken to the neighbors who objected to the <br />new deck. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.