My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-20 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2020
>
01-08-20 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2020 10:46:30 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 10:46:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – January 8, 2020 2 <br /> <br />use by right under the current Zoning Code. The Subject Property is located at 1261 County Road <br />E. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann reported the Subject Property is a veterinary clinic facing County <br />Road E in the B-2 General Business District that has been in continuous operation since 1984. At <br />the time, a veterinary clinic was not a permitted use for the Subject Property within the B-2 <br />District. However, on April 23rd, 1984, the City Council approved Special Use Permit Case No. <br />84-5 (“Case No. 84-5”) that gave the Applicants permission to operate a clinic, which the Zoning <br />Code defines in City Code Section 1305.04 as a building for out-patient medical treatment of <br />humans or small animals. Case No. 845 included conditions of approval such as a limit on the <br />business hours and number of employees. When the City adopted its current Zoning Code in <br />1993, the Subject Property no longer needed a Special Use Permit to operate a clinic in the B-2 <br />District because the clinic is permitted in the B-2 District under the current Zoning Ordinance as <br />per Section 1320.05. However, under the current Zoning Ordinance, a clinic with an accessory <br />use as a kennel for the boarding of animals still requires a Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann explained the current use of the subject property is not <br />intensifying from its original approvals and there are no exterior modifications proposed site with <br />this request. It is important to note that the subject property is non-conforming due to the size and <br />setback requirements of the lot and a variance was granted as a condition of approval for <br />Planning Case No. 84-5. Per the city attorney, the previously approved variance will carry over <br />to the new Conditional Use Permit as a condition of approval. Staff note that in the 35 year <br />history of the clinic operating at that location, there have been no code enforcement complaints <br />regarding traffic and parking conditions and other nuisance characteristics, and Staff does not <br />anticipate that approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment will have a negative impact. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided <br />the Findings of Fact: <br /> <br />General Findings: <br />1. The Subject Property is located at 1261 County Road E in the B-2 General Business <br />Zoning District. <br />2. The Subject Property is the Arden Shoreview Animal Hospital, defined as a clinic use in <br />Section 1305.04 in the City Zoning Code. <br />3. At the time it received approval, an animal clinic was not a permitted use and required a <br />Special Use Permit. <br />4. The Subject Property has been continuously operated as a clinic for 35 years. <br />5. The City’s Zoning Code was amended in 1993 to allow clinics by right in the B-2 General <br />Business District. <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permit Amendment Findings: <br />1. The Subject Property was previously granted a Special Use Permit to operate a veterinary <br />clinic on the Subject Property in 1984 (SUP 84-5). <br />2. The Subject Property has not been expanded, renovated, or modified since the Special <br />Use Permit was issued. <br />3. These are the first amendments to the SUP proposed since it was initially approved. <br />4. An application for amendment shall be administered in the same manner as required for a <br />new application.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.