My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-06-2020 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2020
>
05-06-2020 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 9:36:26 AM
Creation date
5/12/2020 9:35:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dear Mr. Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner, <br /> <br />Please consider this attachment to our Land Use Application containing a detailed explanation of our plan <br />to replace the deck in the front of our house. Our proposed plan largely follows the current structure, <br />which is original to the house. This deck is an essential feature of the house, as it provides the only <br />access to our front door. The plan does not extend any farther toward the lot boundary than the current <br />deck and adjoining stone stairs, nor is it any higher than the current deck. Our plan has increased the <br />area in front of our front door to make the front door more accessible and to create a space in the front or <br />our house for neighborly engagement. It has also removed a section to the west of the front door. <br />Our house was designed and built by the previous owner, who is an architect. The home has <br />architectural details that are part of what drew us to the home (along with the neighborhood and city). <br />One of these details is the deck (and “bridge”) in the front over the sunken courtyard. We would like to <br />maintain this original design intent of the deck while making it more structurally sound and more <br />functional. <br />The reasons the deck needs to be replaced are as follows: <br />• The current structure is original to the house and some of the decking is failing due to rotting <br />wood after over 50 years in service. <br />• Some of the current support structure is not up to current standards for newly built decks. <br />• The current decking is 2X4 lumber which is not commonly used for decking anymore. Modern <br />decking material are thinner and require closer joist spacing. <br />• The small area around the front door makes it difficult to maneuver in around the out-swung door. <br />The reasons for the proposed design are as follows: <br />• We want to maintain the design intent and feel of the original house plan. <br />• Maintain the recessed “courtyard” that is original to the lot and house design. <br />• Promote neighborhood engagement by creating an inviting front-porch atmosphere. <br />• Improve functionality of the deck without substantially altering the original intent of the house <br />plan. <br />• No part of the proposed design of the deck, including the “Bridge” section and adjoining steps will <br />extend beyond the current location of the end of the bridge and adjoining wooden and stone <br />steps. <br />• The new design would improve sight lines through the area by reducing visual size of deck <br />because of the more open railing system. <br />• The new design would use sustainable recycled decking material. (Current decking is 2X4 which <br />is no longer standard and is not available in recycled material). <br />• Incorporate into an updated landscape design that also replaces the failing flag stone wall. <br />• Overall landscape design will replace some sections of grass with mulch and native, pollinator- <br />friendly plantings and new trees. <br /> <br />The Impacts of the design change are as follows: <br />• The proposed design does not extend any further toward the properly line than the current <br />structure of the “bridge” and the adjoining wooden and stone stairs. <br />• The height of the proposed structure will be the same as the current structure. The height of the <br />deck above the grade of the adjacent driveway near the house is only about 10 inches. The <br />height of the deck above the grade immediately below it is due to the recessed “courtyard”. <br />• The change in railing should improve sight lines, as the existing railing system is very "opaque" <br />and boxy feeling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.