My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-20-2020-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
04-20-2020-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2020 10:41:24 AM
Creation date
5/13/2020 10:41:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 20, 2020 3 <br />Brian Wurdeman, Kimley Horn, stated he was proposing to have 131 parking stalls one the site. <br />He has been told by the grocer that the site should have 80 to 90 parking stalls leaving the <br />remainder of the site for the retail outlot pad. He commented there may be some flexibility with <br />the site but did not anticipate a huge change could be made to the setbacks on the site. He <br />indicated the setbacks were equal to or greater than what the site had currently. <br />Councilmember Holden explained she had concerns with the small setbacks and questioned <br />where snow would be stored. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom stated this would be something addressed by <br />staff during the Site Plan Review process. He commented this was an area for concern but noted <br />the area proposed for zero setbacks, had a zero setback today. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she was against the zero setbacks. <br />Councilmember Scott explained at this time he was throwing up a yellow flag for this project <br />and stated he would like more work to be done on this project. <br />Councilmember McClung stated he has had growing concerns with lack of information the City <br />Council was receiving. He expressed concern with the setbacks requested and feared the <br />developer was trying to put too much onto the site. He questioned if the retail/restaurant should <br />be removed. He indicated he also would have to give this project a yellow flag, but was close to <br />red. He requested more detail from the developer in order to gain support for the project. <br />Mayor Grant commented this was a yellow flag project. He recommended the setbacks be <br />reconsidered and the site be redesigned. He encouraged the applicant to reconsider the project <br />design. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the applicant was requesting landscaping flexibility. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated the proposed landscaping <br />would be similar to what was currently on the site. It was noted there would be an increase in <br />greenspace. <br />Councilmember Holden questioned how the Council felt about another drive-thru in this area. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented on the number of drive- <br />thrus in this area. He explained the main consideration for the Council would be to decide how it <br />feels about the three foot setback. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she didn't mind the drive-thru but stated she was against the three <br />foot setback. She recommended the setback be at least 10 feet. <br />Councilmember Holmes commented she could support a drive-thru and anticipated the City <br />would have to change its ordinance regarding the distance between drive-thrus. She indicated she <br />did have a problem with the proposed setbacks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.