My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-2020-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
07-27-2020-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 3:57:41 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 3:55:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JUNE 15, 2020 3 <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault explained the agreement does not require the City to bond for the <br />entire project at this time, but rather allows for the option of the three cities to bond jointly for the <br />construction of the fire station at some point in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes commented she did not understand why the City of Arden Hills had to <br />be responsible for bonding for the fire station. She questioned why this could not be done by <br />Shoreview. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault stated this was a fair point and noted the language could be <br />changed to note one of the cities would be responsible for bonding on behalf of the three cities. <br />He discussed how the overall expense for the project would be reduced slightly if one city were to <br />bond for the entire project versus having each city bond separately for the fire station construction. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden recommended this agreement only address the purchase of the land and <br />that the construction of the fire station be addressed within a future agreement. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault reported a JPA had to be in place in order to allow the cities to <br />come together to bond for the project. He explained the LJFD was not allowed to bond for the <br />project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott stated he saw this project as an all or nothing deal. He didn’t see the sense <br />in purchasing the land without having an agreement in place between the three cities to bond for a <br />fire station in the future. He supported all of the documents being included in a JPA. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned why the City of Arden Hills would be responsible for <br />bonding for this project. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault commented this was being proposed because the fire station would <br />reside in Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the fire station bonding. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung indicated some cities were requesting state bonding for fire stations <br />and noted this would be pursued by LJFD. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented he would have to have language included within the agreement that the <br />City would have the option to purchase the fire station or he would not be able to support the <br />document. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung supported the City entering into an agreement for the purchase of the <br />land at this time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated she could support the City entering into an agreement for the <br />purchase of the land, but not the financing for the building. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.