07-08-2020 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 3, 2020 9 8. Prior to the release of the Final plat, the property owner of Lot 1, Block 1 shall submit a maintenance plan for the exiting trails on the subject parcel unless a written agreement between the City and owner establishes a different requirement. 9. A 6-ft wide sidewalk shall be constructed along the realigned section of the private driveway extending from Pine Tree Drive to Lot 3. 10. A 6-ft wide sidewalk shall be constructed along the west side of Pine Tree Drive from Outlot A to the north boundary of “Exception Parcel C” upon development of Lot 2 or relocation of the private driveway. 11. A traffic impact analysis shall be prepared in accordance with City standards and provided to City staff for review prior to development of Lot 1 and Lot 2. 12. Proposed extensions of water main and sanitary sewer constructed within Lot 1, Lot 2 and Outlot A shall be private utility services. Public utility easements will not be required over private water and sanitary sewer utilities within the site. The development agreement shall include private access easements over these utilities to the benefit of the three lots. 13. The Applicant shall add a 20-ft wide public drainage and utility easement to the plat extending along the north lot line for Lot 1, Block 1 and along the north lot line for Outlot A. 14. The Applicant shall add a 20-ft wide public drainage and utility easement to the plat extending along the south lot line for Lot 3, Block 1 between the east right-of-way line at the terminus of Dunlap Street and the southwest corner of Lot 1. 15. The Applicant shall add a 10-ft wide public drainage and utility easement to the plat extending along the north lot line for Lot 3, Block 1 between Outlot A and the west lot line for Lot 3. 16. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the May 27, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Gehrig opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Wicklund asked if staff discussed the 16 conditions with the applicant. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported staff had discussed the conditions with the applicant. He explained the applicant supported the staff recommended conditions. Commissioner Wicklund stated he supported the request from Bethel University. Commissioner Vijums discussed the trail system and asked if the existing trails would be replaced after the new buildings were constructed.