Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 3, 2020 7 <br /> <br />to serve as a twinhome. He commented further on the tree loss and noted he was not a fan of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund discussed the variance requirements and noted the applicant was <br />requesting to go from 85 feet to 81 feet. He believed the applicant was proposing a reasonable <br />use. He appreciated the fact the developer was proposing to have lots sizes and homes that <br />would match the character of the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jefferys understood this property needed to be redevelopment, but she was <br />concerned about the proposed lot widths. She feared that the only reason the applicant was <br />requesting a variance was for economic reasons. <br /> <br />Chair Gehrig commented variance requests were all different and unique. He stated the <br />variance request was not extreme. He noted the proposed development would not place an <br />extreme strain on the neighborhood or abuse City services. He appreciated the fact the developer <br />was taking into consideration the character of the neighborhood. He understood the homes <br />would be a little closer together, but he believed this would match the adjacent neighborhood. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth stated the only conformance issue to consider was the lot width. He <br />believed that the proposed lot widths successfully addressed City Code. He explained he would <br />be supporting this Planning Case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones indicated he liked the smaller lots with smaller homes as this would be <br />more in keeping with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth moved and Commissioner Vijums seconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 20-003 for a Preliminary Plat and Variance at 3246 <br />New Brighton Road based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by <br />the eighteen (18) conditions in the June 3, 2020, report to the Planning Commission. A roll <br />call vote was taken. The motion carried 5-2 (Commissioners Jefferys and Subramanian <br />opposed). <br /> <br />B. Planning Case 20-005; 2 Pine Tree Drive North – Master Planned Unit Development <br />Request, Preliminary and Final Plat – Public Hearing <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated in 2013 Bethel University <br />acquired the Country Financial facility at 2 Pine Tree Drive. The property consists of three (3) <br />parcels that total approximately 43 acres. The northern parcel which is 21.52 acres in size <br />contains the access road off of Pine Tree Drive and the majority of the surface parking. The <br />center parcel which is 19.16 acres in size contains an existing 181,432 square foot office building <br />and a small fraction of the surface parking. The remaining undeveloped parcel to the south is <br />2.43 acres in size and is made up of mainly woodlands and wetlands. The Applicant is proposing <br />to subdivide the northern parcel into two (2) lots and consolidate the center parcel and the <br />remaining southern exception parcel into one lot of record. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the subject property is <br />located within the B-2 General Business District, where higher educational uses are permitted by <br />Conditional Use Permit (CUP). At its November 25, 2013 meeting, the City Council approved a