Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Phase I Environmental Site Assessment <br />Old Snelling Avenue & County Road E Improvements <br />WSB Project No. 015447-000 Page 1 <br />1. Summary <br /> <br />WSB was retained by the City of Arden Hills (City) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment <br />(ESA) for the proposed Old Snelling Avenue and County Road E Improvements project located in Arden <br />Hills, Minnesota (the Project Corridor). The objective of the assessment was to identify Recognized <br />Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the Project Corridor according to ASTM E1527-13 <br />“Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments”. <br /> <br />The Project Corridor is a north-south segment of Old Snelling Avenue in Arden Hills, Ramsey County, <br />Minnesota. The Project Corridor is approximately 0.8 miles long, extending from north of County Road E <br />(approximately Arden Oaks Drive) at the north end to Trunk Highway (TH) 51 at the south end, including <br />a proposed roundabout intersection at County Road E. The Project Corridor is in the western half of <br />Section 34, Township 30N, Range 23W and in the southwest corner of Section 27, Township 30N, Range <br />23W. Land use surrounding the Project Corridor consists primarily of single-family dwellings with a <br />commercial building at the north end. A Project Corridor Location map and a Project Corridor Details map <br />are included as Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. <br /> <br />WSB has performed this Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice <br />E1527-13. Exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 2.3 of this assessment. <br />This Phase I ESA has been prepared exclusively for the City. No additional parties may rely on the <br />contents of this report unless written authorization is obtained from WSB. <br /> <br />This Phase I ESA has identified two (2) RECs, no historical recognized environmental conditions <br />(HRECs), and no controlled recognized environmental conditions (CRECs) in connection with the Project <br />Corridor (see Figure 3). The following RECs were identified: <br /> <br />REC-1: Contaminated Soils Encountered During Bridge Replacement <br /> <br />Contaminated soil was encountered in 2018 during the replacement of Bridge 62J17 located on the <br />southern portion of the Project Corridor. Soil samples collected from three stockpiles generated during <br />construction identified benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalent concentrations above the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency (MPCA) Screening Soil Leaching Value (SLV) and diesel range organics (DRO) above <br />the MPCA’s criteria for unregulated fill. Based on the analytical results, a total of 486 cubic yards of <br />polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)- and DRO-impacted soil was removed during bridge construction <br />and disposed offsite at a certified landfill. It is possible that contaminated soil remains in this area. The <br />former and/or current presence of PAH- and DRO- impacted soil in the vicinity of Bridge 62J17 is <br />considered a REC. <br /> <br />REC-2: Petroleum Odor Noted During Geotechnical Investigation <br /> <br />At total of 15 geotechnical soil borings were advanced along the Project Corridor in 2019 in preparation <br />for roadway improvements. The borings were advanced to 14.5 feet below grade and approximately <br />every 400 linear feet along the Project Corridor. While completing the borings, an “apparent hydrocarbon <br />odor” was noted in 11 of the 15 boring locations at depths ranging from 0.3 to 14.5 feet below grade. No <br />analytical soil samples were collected during the geotechnical investigation. The presence of petroleum <br />odors noted throughout the Project Corridor during the 2019 Geotechnical Investigation is considered a <br />REC. <br /> <br />Additionally, the following items of environmental note were identified: <br /> <br />Spill Listings <br /> <br />Multiple Spills and Historical Spills incidents were listed at the Project Corridor and/or at sites located <br />adjacent to the Project Corridor. The reported spills were surficial in nature and did not impact soil or <br />groundwater. All reported Spills / Historical Spills listings have been issued closure by the MPCA. It is <br />possible that documented and/or undocumented spills may be encountered during roadway <br />improvements.