Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment C <br /> Dear Mr. Mrosla, Community Development Manager/City Planner, and Mr Hartmann, Associate Planner <br /> Please consider this revised proposal for Planning Case 20-004 (1741 Venus Avenue Variance), in <br /> response to our initial variance request being tabled by the City Council on May 26th 2020. We appreciate <br /> the flexibility allowed us by the City Council to submit a revised plan without having to restart the process <br /> from the beginning. <br /> In the time since the May City Council meeting, we considered two options for our revised plan. First, <br /> modifying the plan to include a roof, making the structure a covered porch. Second, reducing the <br /> requested setback relief to what we felt would be the minimum required to meet our needs. <br /> We decided that a covered porch was not a viable option for our situation. Extending a roof over a <br /> covered porch on the south side of our house would block too much sunlight from the two windows we <br /> have in area of the proposed porch. <br /> We have decided to pursue the second option for our revised plan. Our revised plan requests a setback <br /> allowance of 33' instead of the 34' allowed for a deck in the front yard (see Figure 7). Our initial proposal <br /> was for a 28' setback. This variance will allow us to ensure a safe access to the front door(including <br /> access for emergency responders—see Figure 8) given the unique circumstance of a front door raised <br /> several feet from the ground (see Figures 3, 4, 5) The proposed deck is 1' closer to the property line <br /> than allowed without the variance (Figure 7). The deck will still be 48' from the street (due to the 15' right- <br /> of-way) and thus would not give the appearance of being too close to the street. <br /> The setback for the revised deck plan is 33' from the property line (initial plan was 285) and 48'from the <br /> street (initial plan was 435) (Figure 7). The square footage of the revised deck plan is now 288 sq ft <br /> (initial plan was 370 sq ft) and is less than the existing deck structure (298 sq ft) (see Figure 6). Please <br /> see the tables below comparing the existing structure, our initial proposal, and the revised proposal. Note: <br /> Since our initial proposal, we excavated the property line stake and found it to be 15' from the street <br /> instead of the 15.5' in the initial proposal. <br /> • Distance of Deck from Street, Curb and Property line: <br /> =rom From Inside From Droperty <br /> Distances (all at closests point) Uni-is Street of Curb Line Comment <br /> House ft 55.5 53.5 40.5 Existing <br /> Existing I]eck ft 51.7 49.7 36.7 Existing <br /> Existing Bridge ft 26.2 24.2 11.2 Existing <br /> Initial Proposal -Deck ft 43.5 41.5 28.5 6.5'Variance <br /> Initial Proposal -Bridge/Stairs ft 26.2 24.2 11.2 Same as Existing <br /> Revised Proposal - Deck ft 48 46 33 1' Variance <br /> Revised Proposal - Bridge/Stairs ft 1 26.2 24.2 1 11.2 Same as Existing <br /> • Area of Total Structure: <br /> Total Deck/Walkway/Bridge/Stair Area Units <br /> Existing ft^2 298 <br /> Intial Proposal ft^2 370 <br /> Revised Proposal ft^2 288 <br />