My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-2020-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
08-24-2020-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2024 12:21:32 AM
Creation date
9/8/2020 4:35:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JULY 13, 2020 6 <br /> Councilmember McClung indicated City Administrator Perrault had done some research into <br /> this, noting Arden Hills was in a unique situation because it has fire services provided through a <br /> non-profit. He requested staff discuss the innerworkings of the SBM Fire Department. <br /> City Administrator Perrault discussed how the Spring Lake Park/Blaine/Mounds View Fire <br /> Department was configured. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated the proposed five year average was in the City's favor. He <br /> reported in the short term the proposal helps the City. He explained Arden Hills would have the <br /> most development in the next 20 to 30 years. <br /> Mayor Grant commented he supported a single city bonding for this project. <br /> Councilmember McClung indicated Arden Hills could support a single city bonding for this <br /> project, but noted Arden Hills would not have to be the bonding agent. <br /> Councilmember Holden expressed concern with how little say Arden Hills has had in this <br /> project. She feared this project was being driven by the other two partner cities. <br /> Mayor Grant agreed it was clear the numbers were being driven by the other two partner cities. <br /> He asked if the Council would agree to bonding the $10 million for this project. <br /> Councilmember Scott stated he could support the City bonding for this project. <br /> Councilmember Holden commented with TCAAP on the horizon, she did not want the City also <br /> bonding for the fire station for the next 10 or 20 years. She indicated she did not want the City's <br /> bond rating to drop because the City was bonding for too many projects. <br /> Mayor Grant questioned if Shoreview should be asked to bond for this project. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated she did not believe it was a big concern to determine who was <br /> going to bond for the project at this point. <br /> Councilmember McClung indicated he could support the City bonding for the fire station. <br /> Mayor Grant explained he preferred the city of Shoreview bonding for this project. He <br /> understood the Council was split on this issue. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated she would prefer Shoreview or North Oaks bonding for the fire <br /> station given the fact Arden Hills would be required to bond a great deal for TCAAP. <br /> Mayor Grant suggested a recommendation be made to the Fire Board that one City bond for the <br /> project and it is Arden Hills' preference to have Shoreview issue the bond. <br /> City Administrator Perrault reported this suggestion could be discussed at the next Fire Board <br /> meeting which would be held on Wednesday, July 15m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.