My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-2020-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
08-24-2020-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2024 12:21:32 AM
Creation date
9/8/2020 4:35:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JULY 23, 2020 4 <br /> Associate Planner Hartmann noted the proposed land use would require a Site Plan, Preliminary <br /> and Final Plat, Rezoning to R-2 District and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the private <br /> drive and for performance standard flexibility (at a minimum, density, minimum lot area per unit <br /> and building height). Minimum lot width would require flexibility, along with minimum front <br /> yard setback, and minimum corner yard setback. <br /> Councilmember Holden said she is not in favor of the request. <br /> Councilmember McClung said there are other issues that they may end up with the ponds and <br /> stormwater issues. He felt it would devastate the character of the neighborhood and not fit in. He <br /> could never support it. <br /> Councilmember Scott said he wouldn't be willing to entertain rezoning and it's across the street <br /> from a park and the density might be problematic. He can't support this project. <br /> Mayor Grant said he wasn't as averse to private drives but can't support the current application. <br /> Councilmember Holmes was not in favor of the rezoning. <br /> Mr. Fair said he appreciated the Council's time and they will withdraw the application. <br /> D. Communications Discussion <br /> City Administrator Perrault noted the Communications Coordinator was not able to attend the <br /> meeting and would have been a key part of the conversation. <br /> Mayor Grant stated unless they'd like to go forward, the item would be postponed. <br /> Councilmember Holden said it's a conversation about what Council wants the Communications <br /> job to be so maybe the Council should still say what they'd like it to be. She felt the <br /> Communications Coordinator is looking for input and whether she's at the meeting or not <br /> wouldn't change what they decide. <br /> Councilmember Holmes felt they should make some preliminary comments. <br /> City Administrator Perrault gave background, noting the Communications Coordinator position <br /> was approved by the City Council in 2017 following discussion that began at the City Council's <br /> strategic planning session. Prior to having the position, the City relied on a volunteer committee <br /> to draft newsletter articles and existing staff for website/social media updates. Since the <br /> Communications Coordinator started, they have taken the newsletter in-house, facilitated a <br /> website upgrade, webpage maintenance, taken on social media/website messaging, and acted as <br /> the point person for the annual State of the City address along with other tasks. Since it has been <br /> three years, they thought it might be an appropriate time to talk about the priorities of the position. <br /> In early 2018 the Communications Coordinator asked Council to rank their priorities, at the top of <br /> the list were the items like the newsletter and website redesign; toward the bottom were digital <br /> storytelling and the annual report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.