My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-2020 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2020
>
09-09-2020 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2020 2:51:25 PM
Creation date
9/9/2020 2:49:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is requesting. The existing garage was just as close to the property line as the <br />proposed garage. <br />4. Alternate locations: The pie shape of the parcel, trees, and setback requirements <br />would restrict a garage on the west side of the existing home. The garage could <br />be moved back. <br />5. Minimization of request: The applicant could reduce the garage depth to a <br />standard 22 feet and then only need a 5 foot setback where 10 feet is required. <br />There is sufficient depth to the lot allowing the garage to be extended out the back <br />for more storage space. <br />Deadline for Al!encv Actions <br />The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on December <br />1, 1999. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute the City must act on this request by Friday, <br />January 28, 2000 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons <br />for an additional 60 day review period. The additional review period would extend to <br />Tuesday, March 28, 2000. The City may with the petitioners consent extend the review <br />period beyond the Tuesday, March 28, 2000 date. <br />City Staff informed the applicant that an additional 60 days would be needed. <br />Lastly, ifthe City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing the reasons for <br />the denial at the time that it denies the request." <br />Options <br />1. Recommend approval as submitted. <br />2. Recommend approval with conditions. <br />3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. <br />4. Table for additional information. <br />Recommendation <br />The Staff, in Planning Case 00-04, recommends approval of the side yard setback <br />variance for the detached garage modifying the request by reducing the width so a 5 foot <br />side yard setback, when a 10 foot is required based on the "Findings - Side Yard Setback <br />Variance ( detached garage)" section of this Staff report dated January 5, 2000. <br />Note: If the Planning Commission makes a recommendation on this Planning Case, then <br />it would be heard at the Monday, January 31, 2000, regular meeting of the City Council.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.