My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-2020-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
09-14-2020-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2024 12:13:53 AM
Creation date
9/11/2020 1:09:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JULY 20, 2020 9 <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if the round-about-was going to be in 2022. <br /> Finance Director Bauman replied that this version of the CIP plan had the round-a-bout pushed <br /> back to 2026. <br /> Councilmember Holmes said she didn't think there had been a decision about whether it would <br /> be built at all. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said last fall there was a feasibility study, and <br /> the City and the County did a study of the intersection in 2018 and that study concluded that a <br /> roundabout was recommended as an improvement. As part of completing the feasibility study for <br /> the intersection the Council would need to decide if they agreed with the recommendation or if <br /> there was another alternative they wish to pursue. <br /> Councilmember Holmes said there was in assumption that Bethel College population on their <br /> main campus would increase, but that is changing. She felt the study may be inaccurate. She said <br /> she wondered if they should do a round-a-bout in an environment where money is tight and there <br /> isn't unanimity on having one. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom agreed that conditions have changed from <br /> what the assumptions are in the report and that could potentially change the recommendation. He <br /> thought it would be a good idea to look at the study again to verify that the recommendations hold <br /> true. <br /> Councilmember Holmes indicated the CIP says there is going to be a roundabout, not when. She <br /> felt there needs to be more consideration of whether or not it will happen. <br /> Councilmember Holden agreed. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said the County had not requested it be <br /> pushed to 2026, it was a change staff offered for consideration to try to balance the cash flow in <br /> the PIR Fund. What was discussed with Ramsey County was if they had concerns about <br /> separating the roadway project of south of County Road E between County Road E and Highway <br /> 51 from the roundabout. The County indicated they had no objections to separating the projects. <br /> He wanted to get feedback from Council before he presented moving the date to the County. <br /> Councilmember McClung asked when can they refocus on the issue to decide how they want to <br /> move forward. <br /> Councilmember Holden wondered if the County decides to do the roundabout does the City have <br /> any way to stop it. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom stated there would need to be a cooperative <br /> agreement between the County and the City for the project to move forward. <br /> Councilmember Scott wondered if the Lexington Avenue project was still on track. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.