Laserfiche WebLink
4. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 4.1 Discussion <br /> Based on our borings, it is our opinion that the proposed watermain and pavement can generally be <br /> supported on the soils encountered in the borings. However, soft, wet lean clay soils should be <br /> anticipated during construction of the watermain and a partial removal and replacement will likely be <br /> necessary. <br /> Also, the soils within the pavement subgrade consist mainly of silty sand soils, which are frost susceptible. <br /> Consideration should be given to partially subcutting these soils and replacing with a non-frost <br /> susceptible granular fill to reduce the potential frost heave below the pavement section. <br /> 4.2 Watermain Utilities <br /> Invert elevations are anticipated to be within 8 feet of existing grades and we anticipate the subgrade <br /> soils for the utilities will consist of granular sandy soils and lean clay. Where the clayey soils are soft and <br /> wet or become soft it may be necessary to perform a partial subcut and replacement. Where soft <br /> unstable soils are encountered at invert grade, subexcavation of these materials to a depth of 1 to 2 feet <br /> and replacement with a coarse sand or gravel is recommended. In addition to providing a more stable <br /> uniform platform to construct the utilities, the sand backfill can act as a platform from which to place a <br /> sump and pump for dewatering. Underground utilities are expected to be installed by backhoes <br /> completing the excavations and placing pipe and backfills. Soil compactors should be used to compact <br /> the fill in thin even lifts to the specified densities. <br /> 4.3 Backfill and Fill Selection and Compaction <br /> It is our opinion the onsite non-organic soils may be reused as backfill and fill provided they are moisture <br /> conditioned and can be compacted to their specified densities. Wet soils that are excavated would need <br /> to be dried before reuse as an engineered fill. We recommend use of a minimum of 2 feet of clean <br /> coarse sand with less than 50 percent passing the #40 sieve and less than 5 percent passing the#200 <br /> sieve when backfilling the bottom of a wet excavation. Backfills with cobbles larger than six inches (6") <br /> should not come in contact with utilities. We recommend that soils be moisture conditioned to meet <br /> compaction specifications as determined from their standard Proctor tests (ASTM D-698). The fill should <br /> be spread in thin lifts (8 to 12 inches depending on material and compaction equipment) to allow for full <br /> depth compaction. Table 2 indicates the recommended compaction levels. <br /> Table 2: Recommended Level of Compaction for Backfill and Fill <br /> Area Percent of Standard Proctor <br /> Maximum Dry Density <br /> Pavement: Within 3 feet of top of aggregate base 100 <br /> Within 3 foot perimeter of structures such <br /> as manholes <br /> Pavement: Greater than 3 feet below aggregate base 95 <br /> Utility Trench (unless within 3 feet of aggregate base) 95 <br /> Landscaping (non-structural) 90 <br /> 4.4 Dewatering <br /> Based on the results of our soil borings and the proposed construction, water seepage into the utility <br /> trenches is anticipated. The seepage is anticipated where excavations extend into wet clay soils. It is <br /> our opinion that sumps and pumps placed in low points of the excavations should be adequate to control <br /> most infiltrating water situations. <br /> Geotechnical Report <br /> 2020 PMP Street Improvements <br /> Arden Hills,Minnesota <br /> WSB Project No.014297-000 Page 5 <br />