My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-2020-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
09-14-2020-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2024 12:13:53 AM
Creation date
9/11/2020 1:09:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—AUGUST 17, 2020 6 <br /> Councilmember Holmes said it was addressed several years ago but the Council felt the majority <br /> of the residents didn't want them. Since that time a petition was emailed to her but she thinks a <br /> number of residents are still not interested because a suburban environment isn't conducive for <br /> raising chickens. She is not for changing the ordinance. She didn't know how they would <br /> enforce the rules and that once people go back to work, or once winter is here people may have a <br /> different opinion. Also coyotes and hawks is another disadvantage for chickens. <br /> Mayor Grant felt it could be an issue for the neighbors. Part of raising chickens is having a <br /> chicken coop that neighbors have to look at. Along with winter and caring for fowl. He would <br /> have to have some pretty severe ordinance language. <br /> City Administrator Perrault clarified that he believes there is a petition online but no petition <br /> has been formally submitted to the City by the petitioner. <br /> Councilmember Holden said she thought it was sent to all the Councilmembers around April. <br /> She has had residents talk to her about this and so felt there should be a discussion regardless if <br /> there was a petition. <br /> Councilmember Scott said he knew of a few residents that had chickens. One had problems <br /> keeping them contained, another neighbor had them and a coyote or some other animal got into <br /> them. He felt that by allowing them it could actually increase the coyote problem. Another <br /> person in another city said the chickens would bite him. For the people he knows that have had <br /> chickens it didn't end well, so he wouldn't support a change. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how big would a coop have to be to have 2 or 3 chickens, and <br /> would a coop be that ugly when people look at stuff in people's backyards anyway. She felt they <br /> should charge a permit fee, and if they get complaints they can no longer have them. The last <br /> time they reviewed this no cities allowed chickens but things have changed. Maybe they need a <br /> public meeting to discuss. <br /> Councilmember McClung had heard from people supportive and others not interested. He felt <br /> an ordinance would have to be crafted restrictively and carefully, and a permit on a year to year <br /> basis. <br /> Councilmember Holmes said our enforcement staff is busy enforcing our current ordinances and <br /> ordinances are difficult to enforce. Responsible owners won't be the problem. There could be <br /> coops falling into disrepair and odor issues. Most people she's talked to are not on board with <br /> chickens. <br /> Mayor Grant said he is still leaning to no chickens. <br /> Councilmember McClung there are a number of residents that are asking for this and he is a bit <br /> more open to it. <br /> Councilmember Holden noted the Council is split 3-2 so she will bring it up again next year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.