Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — AUGUST 10, 2020 5 <br />Associate Planner Hartmann reported the applicants were in attendance. <br />Councilmember Holmes questioned if the applicants were requesting a deck that was one foot <br />wider than allowed by City Code. <br />Associate Planner Hartmann stated this was the case. <br />Councilmember Holden inquired if decks were allowed on the front of houses. <br />Associate Planner Hartmann explained code does permit decks to encroach in the front yard, <br />but only six feet. He noted the applicants were asking for a seven foot wide deck. <br />Mayor Grant requested further information regarding the six foot encroachment. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla indicated a deck could be six feet <br />into the front yard setback. <br />Mayor Grant inquired how far this deck would encroach into the setback. <br />Associate Planner Hartmann stated a seven foot wide deck would be 33 feet from the front <br />property line. He noted the home was 40.5 feet from the property line. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Scott moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to adopt <br />Resolution 92020-030 Approving Planning Case 20-004 for a Variance at 1741 <br />Venus Avenue, based on the Findings of Fact and the submitted plans in the <br />August 10, 2020 Report to the City Council. <br />Councilmember McClung asked if this new application was 10 square feet less than the existing <br />deck or the prior request. <br />Associate Planner Hartmann explained this request was 10 square feet less than the deck that <br />was currently on the property. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she was confused and she didn't understand what the one <br />additional foot of deck space would add to this property. She indicated she could not support this <br />variance request. <br />Councilmember Holmes commented she believed the Council made it very clear the City did not <br />support front yard decks. She indicated the applicant has the ability to build what was there plus a <br />little bit more. She did not see anything in the variance language that would allow for one <br />additional foot to come forward. She stated she did not see any reason for granting the variance at <br />this time. <br />Mayor Grant questioned how wide the existing walkway was. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the existing walkway was <br />4.5 feet wide. <br />