Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 9, 2020 2 <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann stated the Applicant is requesting a Variance to expand the <br />current 528 square foot garage on the Subject Property into a 1,100 square foot garage. The <br />maximum size of a garage allowed by right is 728 square feet. The existing garage meets the <br />front and rear yard setbacks which are forty (40) and thirty (30) feet from the front and rear <br />property lines, respectively, but the garage is only three (3) feet from the side yard setback where <br />a ten (10) foot side yard setback is required for an accessory structure in the R-1 district. Due to <br />the size of the request and the current garage’s legal nonconforming side yard setback (refer to <br />Planning Case 00-004 for the previously approved three (3) foot setback variance), the Applicant <br />requires a variance approval for the expansion of the garage. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann reported the Applicant is proposing to expand the accessory <br />structure in order to gain more storage space for their vehicles. According to the Applicant’s <br />narrative submitted as a part of their application, when the sidewalk was installed within the <br />easement facing County Road E, they lost driveway space that they had been using for the <br />storage of vehicles. Expanding the garage will allow them to store their vehicles on the property <br />safely. The Applicant has also indicated to staff that they intend to widen the driveway with <br />permeable pavers and seek a future expansion of the house so that the increased size of the <br />garage will not appear out of character with the property or the neighborhood. No permits have <br />been pulled for these projects yet, and while they would require separate building plan review, <br />these projects would not require a variance. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided <br />the Findings of Fact for review: <br /> <br />1. City Staff received a land use application for a request to build a bigger garage for a <br />single family dwelling at the Subject Property 1434 County Road E. <br />2. A garage for a single-family detached dwelling is a permitted use in the R-1 Single <br />Family Residential District. <br />3. The Subject Property is a legal nonconforming lot due to the lot not meeting the <br />minimum width requirement for the R-1 District. <br />4. The Subject Property is non-conforming with the R-1 District’s standards for minimum <br />lot length requirements. <br />5. The proposed development of the Subject Property would conform to all other <br />requirements and standards of the R-1 district. 6. The Subject Property was previously <br />granted a side yard setback variance of three (3) feet for a garage under Planning Case 00- <br />004. <br />7. The proposed structure would not exceed the three (3) foot variance distance previously <br />approved. <br /> 8. A variance may be granted if enforcement of a provision in the zoning ordinance would <br />cause the landowner practical difficulties. <br />9. Variances are only permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and <br />intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 20-014 for a <br />Variance at 1434 County Road E, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as <br />amended by the conditions below: <br /> <br />1. A Building Permit shall be issued prior to commencement of construction.