My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-2020-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
09-14-2020-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2020 5:10:45 PM
Creation date
10/14/2020 5:10:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 14, 2020 7 <br />City Administrator Perrault stated this was a historical item and noted the expense could be <br />moved to a separate line item. <br />Mayor Grant commented he did not believe it was necessary to make this a separate line item. <br />Councilmember Holden suggested this item be placed under Administration or under its own <br />line item. <br />Councilmember Holmes stated two large projects were included in the building permit revenues <br />for next year. She indicated the Council should take into consideration how this line item would <br />be impacted if these projects did not go forward. She discussed the Karth Lake assessment and <br />questioned how these assessments would be administered. <br />Finance Director Bauman explained once the paperwork was sent to . Ramsey County, the <br />County would administer the distribution and collection of these fees. <br />Councilmember McClung commented he did not have any problem with the Karth Lake <br />assessments or the Truth in Taxation hearing date. He indicated he was having trouble with 5% <br />levy increase. He stated he would like to see this reduced to 3% by December. He explained he <br />could support a tax levy of 4% at this time. <br />Councilmember Scott reported this was a preliminary levy and noted this was a not to exceed <br />amount that could come down. He stated the City gives itself some wiggle room within the <br />preliminary levy and could reduce this amount between September and December. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she agreed with Councilmember McClung. She stated the <br />City had $478,000 leftover from last year. For this reason, she recommended the City move <br />forward with a 4% tax levy so as not to have an overly high surplus. <br />Mayor Grant commented he understood this was a preliminary levy. He explained he could <br />support a 4% tax levy moving forward at this time. <br />Councilmember Holmes stated she would like the City to move forward with a 5% tax levy for <br />2021. She indicated the City would not be putting a sizeable transfer into the PIR fund in 2020 <br />due to the purchase of the fire station property. For this reason, she recommended the Council <br />approve a 5% tax levy for the coming year. <br />Councilmember Scott commented he supported a 4.5% tax levy. He stated he did not want the <br />City to have to approve larger increases in the future. <br />Mayor Grant provided a summary of the comments being made by the Council and asked if the <br />Council could support the preliminary tax levy being set at 4.25%. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she could support 4.25%. <br />Councilmember McClung explained he could support the preliminary tax levy being set at <br />4.25%. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.