My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2020-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
09-28-2020-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2020 3:06:49 PM
Creation date
10/30/2020 2:59:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 11 <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this would be allowed. He <br />explained this was addressed in Condition 31. He discussed how the City defined finished spaces, <br />such as an office use, lunch room, and locker room. <br />Mr. Salzer commented his specific request would be to have a maximum of 15% of the space be <br />non -warehouse. He stated this would include office and lab space. <br />Councilmember Holden inquired how manufacturing space would be finished. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla indicated a manufacturing space <br />would look much like a warehousing space and would be unfinished. <br />Mr. Salzer explained architects had to classify manufacturing spaces differently. He noted <br />production components have different classifications and exit distances. He reported his goal was <br />to create jobs and noted this would be greatly assisted by the City offering him flexibility in the <br />building space design. <br />Councilmember Scott stated he was not going to get bogged down by interior space allocation. <br />He explained the City was facing a global pandemic and he appreciated the fact that the Applicant <br />was working to bring good jobs to Arden Hills. <br />Councilmember Holmes agreed with Councilmember Scott. She supported giving the Applicant <br />the requested flexibility. She believed the Applicant was the expert on this type of space and <br />understood there was a need for flexibility. She was not comfortable with the Council dictating <br />how the interior space should be designated. <br />Councilmember Holden commented if the focus was on the jobs, the most important space in the <br />building would be the 15% that was being used for office space. She explained she would not be <br />able to 'support the 15%. <br />Councilmember McClung indicated the decrease of 10% was too much for him. He stated he <br />could not support the requested level of flexibility. <br />Mayor Grant explained he also believed 15% was too low for the amount of office space. He <br />recalled from previous conversations that the Council had recommended this be set at 20%. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she could support the office space being set at 20%. <br />Mayor Grant requested the Council turn the discussion to the requested flexibility for the <br />building height. <br />Councilmember Scott indicated he supported the requested building height flexibility. <br />Councilmember Holmes and Councilmember Holden concurred. <br />Councilmember McClung stated the building height was not a concern for him. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.