My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-2020-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
10-19-2020-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2024 12:06:30 AM
Creation date
12/2/2020 3:16:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—OCTOBER 19, 2020 4 <br /> There doesn't appear to be much room to increase fees as you will lose participation. You need to <br /> find the sweet spot where you charge enough to maximize revenue but not too much where you <br /> scare off participation. The committee wants to see the user charges kept at a high enough level <br /> that meets with the approval of the majority of users and utilize grants and scholarships through <br /> the Arden Hills Foundation to assist with costs for those that can't afford to participate. <br /> Finance Director Bauman stated the Net Cost line from Attachment A represents the amount of <br /> taxpayer dollars being utilized toward recreation programs. It ranges from $96,607 to $184,550 <br /> for the years 2009 to 2019. The current 2021 estimate is $145,550. The cost factor having the <br /> biggest impact on this number is full time employee wages that can vary from year to year. <br /> Finance Director Bauman said items for the City Council to consider include: <br /> • Is the range of 95% - 105% an acceptable level of coverage of direct costs by program <br /> revenues? <br /> • Do you want to look at coordinating with other cities for any of our adult programs? <br /> • What programs do you want to make available and what user charges will the market support <br /> to run them? <br /> • Is there an amount of taxpayer dollars the council is comfortable with for allocating toward <br /> recreation programs? <br /> Councilmember Holden wondered what categories go into the 55% for Parks for the Program <br /> Coordinator. <br /> Finance Director Bauman explained how she split up the percentages. She also said Recreation <br /> is all the programs that are done through the Rec program brochure; the programs offered, revenue <br /> collected, supplies purchased and other charges directly related to those programs. <br /> Councilmember Holmes felt staff did a nice job of summarizing what the FPAC came up with. <br /> The committee felt the direct cost of the programs should be covered by the direct expenses so as <br /> to break even and staff salaries are overhead and not covered. Program costs to residents have to <br /> be competitive but staff costs wouldn't be able to be covered with that revenue. She felt they need <br /> to decide if they want to devote two full time people and their expenses to the Park and Rec <br /> program. <br /> Councilmember Holden thought maybe they should have one full-time year-round and add one <br /> part-time person in the summer. <br /> Mayor Grant said they could also have a full time and part time person year-round. <br /> City Administrator Perrault suggested this could be something the Personnel Committee could <br /> discuss and bring back to Council. <br /> Councilmember Holmes said she'd like to hear Public Works Director/City Engineer <br /> Blomstrom's thoughts as the supervisor of the department. <br /> Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom stated historically staffing has been between <br /> 1.25 to 2 FTEs. He characterized the recreation program as generally needing two full-time <br /> employees at certain times during the year, such as managing spring and summer programs. One <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.