My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-21-2020-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
12-21-2020-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2020 9:57:47 AM
Creation date
12/18/2020 9:50:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />COUNTY ROAD E & OLD SNELLING AVENUE ICE PAGE 9 <br />WSB PROJECT NO. 011498-000 <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br />▪ Warrant 3 – Peak-hour Vehicle Volume: NOT MET <br />▪ Warrant 4 – Pedestrian Volume: NOT MET <br />▪ Warrant 5 – School Crossing: N/A <br />▪ Warrant 6 – Coordinated Signal System: N/A <br />▪ Warrant 7 – Crash Experience1: NOT MET <br />▪ Warrant 8 – Roadway Network: NOT MET <br />▪ Warrant 9 – Intersection Near a Grade Crossing: N/A <br /> <br />No Traffic Signal Warrants are met with existing traffic volumes, lane geometry, and <br />speed limits. <br />All-Way Stop Warrant Analysis <br /> <br />Part 2B of the MnMUTCD contains information pertaining to the all-way stop control with <br />criteria relating to vehicular volumes and crash history that define the minimum conditions <br />under which installing an all-way stop could be justified. <br /> <br />The following are the discussions regarding whether the intersection geometry and/or <br />traffic volumes meet the guidance in the MnMUTCD. Text in italics denotes guidance from <br />the MnMUTCD, and regular text denotes discussion on whether conditions meet the <br />guidance. Using the provided count data, all-way stop warrants were analyzed. <br /> <br />• A multi-way stop application can be used as an interim measure while <br />arrangements can be made to install a traffic signal – A traffic signal is not <br />warranted at this intersection. <br />• Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to <br />correction by a multi-way stop installation - Only two correctable crashes <br />occurred within a 12-month period within the past 5 years at this intersection. <br />• Minimum volumes – 3 of the required 8 hours were met, See Appendix D for <br />volume analysis. <br />• Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where the preceding criteria are all <br />satisfied to 80% of the minimum values. – 7 of the required 8 hours were met, <br />See Appendix D for the 80% minimum value analysis. (the eighth hour was <br />three vehicles short of being met) <br />• The need to control left-turn conflicts – Southbound left-turn conflicts need to be <br />controlled due to high turning movements volumes. <br />• The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high <br />pedestrian volumes – The intersection does not currently experience a high level <br />of pedestrian and bicycle traffic that would require installation of a multi-way stop <br />to provide adequate operations, however trail improvements are planned as part <br />of this project. <br /> <br />1 MnDOT 2015 TEM states: Current MnDOT policy is that, in general, warrant 7 is not applicable to an <br />intersection that is already signalized.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.