My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-21-2020-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
12-21-2020-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2020 9:57:47 AM
Creation date
12/18/2020 9:50:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\Concepts\Lexington Station 3 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />restricting left turn movements. The proposed access in the Big O Tires and Arby’s site would <br />become a south bound right in and right out. The City is generally not in a position to remove <br />access from the Big O Tires and Arby’s site to benefit the proposed development, and because of <br />that, staff requested the Applicant to consider adding an access from Lexington Station third <br />addition into the Big O/Arby’s site. However, the proposed access into the Big O Tires and Arby’s <br />site becomes moot if the County moves forward with the Lexington Avenue project as they have <br />the authority to revoke the full access into the Big O Tires and Arby’s site. <br /> <br />City staff has noted concerns with the design of the proposed site access drive in relation to the <br />overall site layout. The layout provides limited vehicle staking distance at the eastbound approach <br />to the signal. During peak traffic periods, exiting vehicles could potentially stack along the east <br />side of the proposed building while waiting for a green signal phase. The site traffic study currently <br />underway will evaluate the current access design and potential site design modifications. The final <br />site layout may change due to recommendations made by the traffic study. <br /> <br />Approvals required <br /> <br />The proposed land use application would require the following approvals: <br /> <br />• Site Plan Review <br />• An Amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) is required due to modified site plan. <br />In addition, a PUD would be use for performance standard flexibility (at a minimum, <br />wall sign, parking lot setbacks and parking stall requirements). <br /> <br />The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary <br />analysis for the proposed development: <br /> <br />Ordinance Requirements B-3 District <br />Standards Proposed Development <br />Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.8 Approx. 0.23 <br />Maximum Structure Coverage 40% 23% <br />Minimum Landscape Lot Area 25% Unknown <br />Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 ft. 140.5 ft. <br />Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20 ft. 37 ft. <br />Minimum Side Yard Setback 20 ft. (min)/ <br />40 ft. (total) <br />68 ft. (min) / 229 ft. (total) <br />Minimum Lot Area 13,000 sq. ft. 183,694 sq. ft. <br />Maximum Building Height 35 ft. 35 ft. <br />Ordinance Flexibility Requested Parking <br />Standards Development Proposal <br />Parking Requirements 1 per 150 sq. ft. 1 per 208 sq. ft. <br />Parking Setback 9 ft. per PUD 7.51 ft. <br />Wall Signage 80 sq. ft. 175 and 90 sq. ft. <br /> <br />Budget Impact <br />NA <br /> <br />Attachments <br />A. Application
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.