Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 9, 2020 4 <br /> <br />1350.02. A revised application should be reviewed in the same manner as required for a new <br />application. Any structural alteration or changes to the original plan require that all procedures <br />shall apply as if a new application were being requested. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and provided <br />the Findings of Fact for review: <br /> <br />1. City Staff received a land use application for a request to build an accessory structure for <br />storage at the Subject Property 3493 Siems Court. <br />2. Storage of personal items is a permitted use for an accessory structure in the R-1 Single <br />Family Residential District. <br />3. The Subject Property has a steep downward slope in the rear yard that prevents the <br />Applicant from building on much of the site. <br />4. The Subject Property meets the minimum lot size, width, and length requirements for the <br />R-1 District. <br />5. The Applicant is requesting flexibility with the maximum height and size restrictions for <br />an accessory storage shed located within the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) <br />setback requirement for Lake Johanna. <br />6. The rear yard setback requirement for a proposed accessory structure is determined by the <br />OWHL of Lake Johanna. <br />7. The proposed structure is located 25.2 feet within the OHWL setback from Lake Johanna <br />which is 50 feet. <br />8. The proposed storage structure would be located outside the Shore Impact Zone of Lake <br />Johanna. <br />9. One (1) storage shed is permitted with the OHWL setback requirement of Lake Johanna <br />as long as it does not exceed 64 square feet in size and eight (8) feet in height and is not <br />within the Shore Impact Zone. <br />10. The proposed structure exceeds the height at nine (9) feet five (5) inches tall and exceeds <br />the area dimension at 93.5 square feet. <br />11. The proposed structure would otherwise conform to all other requirements and standards <br />of the R-1 district. <br />12. A variance may be granted if enforcement of a provision in the zoning ordinance would <br />cause the landowner practical difficulties. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 20-017 for a <br />Variance at 3493 Siems Court, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended <br />by the conditions below: <br /> <br />1. A Zoning Permit for an accessory structure shall be issued prior to commencement of <br />construction. <br />2. The exterior materials of the proposed addition shall be consistent or complementary in <br />color, texture and quality with those visible on the existing structure. <br />3. The Applicant shall add landscaped screening to assist in screening the structure from <br />adjacent properties. Planning staff shall review and approve the screening plan prior to <br />the issuance of Zoning Permit. <br />4. The proposed accessory structure shall conform to all other standards and regulations in <br />the City Code. <br />