My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-21-20-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
12-21-20-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2021 10:43:23 AM
Creation date
1/13/2021 10:43:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 21, 2020 2 <br /> <br />drive through and a standalone 17,841 square foot box retail building on 4.24 acres. During <br />construction of Phase III, a new access on Lexington Avenue would be constructed. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the proposed access would <br />align with the existing Target service entrance and the existing access on Lexington Avenue <br />would be removed. The proposed new access/intersection would include a traffic signal. The <br />proposed traffic signal is included in Ramsey County’s Lexington Avenue reconstruction project <br />that is anticipated to start in 2022. <br /> <br />Dan Rea, Kensington Development Partner, introduced himself and Kensington Development to <br />the Council. He discussed several large projects that he had completed in the Midwest. He <br />provided the Council with a presentation on the Lexington Station 3rd Addition proposed project <br />and noted the areas that required flexibility. The building materials were described in further <br />detail with the Council. It was noted signage relief was being requested. He thanked the Council <br />for their time and noted he was available for comments or questions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott asked if the exterior architecture was unique for the client or if a more <br />generic building type could be pursued. <br /> <br />Mr. Rea stated that the user’s generic building product was more corrugated metal and resin <br />panels. He indicated the proposed building was more contemporary while still trying to match the <br />existing Lexington Station buildings. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned if Phase 3 would be including one building instead of two. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden commented she was concerned about the amount of parking proposed <br />for this project. She indicated there was not enough parking available for Phases 1 and 2. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated he reviewed the Phase 1 and 2 <br />approvals and explained the site was meeting retail parking requirements. He noted there was <br />some peak parking demands in the evening hours due to the restaurants. He reported he was <br />uncertain what new tenants would be occupying Phase 3. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she was concerned about the south elevation. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained this elevation would be <br />blocked by the Big O Tire building and proposed landscaping. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung requested further information on how traffic would flow through the <br />site. <br /> <br />Mr. Rea discussed how traffic would access and exit the site. It was noted traffic would access <br />the site on the east side. The cross site access and traffic stacking were further described with the <br />Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.