My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-21-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
02-16-21-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 4:21:07 PM
Creation date
2/11/2021 4:20:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 3 <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM – 1C <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: February 16, 2021 <br /> <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br /> <br />FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Recreation Programming Discussion <br /> <br /> Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: <br /> N/A N/A N/A <br /> <br />For Council Consideration <br /> <br />The Council may consider making adjustments to recreation programming. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Under a separate discussion item, the City Council will be reviewing upcoming recreation <br />programming and whether or not it would like to offer the full complement of spring/summer <br />programming, a modified version, or no programming at all. The previous year’s spring and <br />summer programming was cancelled due to COVID-19 as a measure to protect residents, staff, <br />and program instructors during the pandemic. Following that discussion, the City Council will <br />also want to consider how it wants to proceed with Recreation Programming on a longer-term <br />basis. <br /> <br />Council had previously directed Staff to work with the City’s Financial, Planning and Analysis <br />Committee (FPAC) on a review of the recreation programming and how it affected the City’s <br />budget. The Committee noted that programming decisions are policy decisions the Council needs <br />to make regarding the level and quality of programming offered by the City, but from a <br />budgetary perspective it would recommend that the programming bring in revenue that equals <br />between 95 percent and 105 percent of direct expenses. It did not offer an opinion on related <br />indirect expenses, the largest category being the two full-time staff members that oversee the <br />recreation function. Following a Council discussion of FPAC’s recommendation, the Council <br />directed staff to bring a discussion on Recreation Programming to a future work session. <br /> <br />The driving question regarding Recreation Programming is the level and breadth of <br />programming the City should be offering. Answering this question will drive other options for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.