Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — JANUARY 25, 2021 7 <br />Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the <br />health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding <br />land and the community in general, including, but not limited to factors and findings. These <br />factors and findings were discussed in detail with the Council. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the Planning Commission <br />reviewed this application and have offered the following findings of fact for Council <br />consideration: <br />1. The Applicant submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use <br />Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Amendment. <br />2. The Subject Property is located within the B-2 General Business District and is guided as <br />CMU, Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. <br />3. The Subject Property is located on approximately 6.40 acres and currently features open <br />space with a wooded area around the wetlands with a segment of the existing Anderson <br />Center trail system running through the site. <br />4. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, 4 story multi -family senior <br />living facility on site. <br />5. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units devoted to <br />independent or assisted living and 33 units devoted to memory care. <br />6. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: parking <br />stall count requirements, building height, permitted number of efficiency units and tree <br />mitigation. <br />7. The proposed development plan meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City <br />Code in the following areas: building setbacks, landscape coverage, parking setbacks, <br />planting islands, tree selection, floor area ratio, drainage wetlands and flood plain tree <br />selection, lighting, screening and aesthetics. <br />8. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by <br />the Applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the <br />nonconformity. <br />9. A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development <br />should not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic <br />operations within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any <br />geometric or traffic control changes. <br />10. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the <br />community as a whole. <br />11. Existing public facilities will be able to absorb the additional demand for public services <br />needed for the proposed use. <br />12. The maximum dwelling unit density per net area that is allowed within the B-2 District is <br />20 units per acre. <br />13. The Applicant is requesting a Zoning ordinance amendment that would to add language <br />allowing memory care units located in the B2 district to be calculated as the equivalent of <br />0.5 units. If approved, the .5 units for density purposes the total number of units is 20 units <br />per acre or 129.5 units and is in conformance with the zoning district and land use plan. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated the Planning Commission <br />recommended the Council approve and authorize staff to publish an Ordinance for Planning Case <br />