Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for December 9th, 2020 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-017 3493 Siems Court - Var\PC Packets\12-9-2020 Page 2 of 10 <br />The Applicant took the Planning Commissions comments under consideration and submitted <br />revised plans for a smaller structure that would not encroach into the Shore Impact Zone. However, <br />the proposed structure still requires a variance due to the proposed height and area that exceeds <br />current ordinance standards. <br /> <br /> <br />The Applicant proposes adding new conditions of approval to the request that would set <br />performance standards for the structure and recognizes that this would set a precedent for future <br />structures located near the shore to follow (Attachment E). <br /> <br />For example, the Applicant proposing the use of language such as calling the overall structure a <br />‘floating shed’ that would require future residents to meet certain conditions unique to this specific <br />scenario. On the Subject Property, the Applicant notes that the site features 100% drainage and <br />runoff beneath the existing structure, with runoff uninhibited by any foundation or any non-natural <br />elements, which could be a condition of approval for future applications. They also request an <br />optional requirement for the addition and maintenance of vegetation around the future structure <br />for environmental and aesthetic purposes. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission is being asked to determine if a variance request for flexibility with the <br />Shoreland Management District setback requirements should be approved for the new proposed <br />accessory structure. This structure requires flexibility from the restrictions for City Code within <br />Shoreland Management Districts. The evaluation of the proposal should be based on the provisions <br />within the Zoning Code and the Requirements for a Variance in Section 1355.04, Subd. 4 and the <br />Continuation of Nonconforming Uses in Section 1350.02. <br /> <br />A revised application should be reviewed in the same manner as required for a new application. <br />Any structural alteration or changes to the original plan require that all procedures shall apply as <br />if a new application were being requested. <br /> <br />Plan Evaluation <br /> <br />Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review <br /> <br />1. District Provisions (R-1 Single Family Residential District) – Section 1320.06 <br /> <br />Lot Size and Dimensions <br />The minimum lot width required for the Subject Property is ninety-five (95) feet and the minimum <br />lot length is 130 feet. The minimum lot size is 14,000 square feet. The Subject Property meets the <br />minimum lot width and length requirements for the R-1 District as well as the minimum lot area <br />requirement. The property is approximately 16,152 square feet in area and, including the deck <br />structure near the shore, maintains a structure coverage of 24.8%, a FAR of 0.26, and an <br />impervious surface coverage of 31.3%. The maximum structure coverage allowed is 25%, the <br />maximum FAR allowed is 0.30, and the maximum impervious surface coverage allowed is 35%. <br />If approved for this variance, the property would be beneath the maximum structure coverage, <br />FAR, and impervious coverage allowed under City Code. <br />