03-08-21-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 7 Councilmember Holmes suggested the City allow for the adult programming with yoga and tai chi outdoors. Mayor Grant stated that the Council Chambers potentially be used for the AARP classes in order to properly space people out. Councilmember Holmes raised concern about bringing people into City Hall and stated she would not sit in a class with 8 to 15 people in the Council Chambers, even if spaced out with a mask on. She did not believe this would be safe. Mayor Grant commented further on the length of the classes that were offered by AARP. Councilmember Holmes recommended the City not offer these classes in 2021. Councilmember Scott supported AARP hosting these classes if they believe they can do it safely. He anticipated those 55 and older that are vaccinated could attend this class safely. Councilmember Holden stated she liked the idea of offering these classes, but understood the classes were available online as well, which may be a better option at this time. Mayor Grant recommended the City not offer the AARP classes this spring or summer, but noted the Council could support the City offering yoga, foot care and tai chi classes. Recreation Programmer Vaughan thanked the Council for their input regarding the spring and summer recreation programming. C. Recreation Programming and Staffing Discussion City Administrator Perrault stated under a separate discussion item, the City Council reviewed recreation programming and whether or not it would like to offer the full complement of spring/summer programming, a modified version, or no programming at all. The previous year’s spring and summer programming was cancelled due to COVID-19 as a measure to protect residents, staff, and program instructors during the pandemic. Following that discussion, the City Council will also want to consider how it wants to proceed with Recreation Programming on a longer-term basis. City Administrator Perrault explained Council had previously directed Staff to work with the City’s Financial, Planning and Analysis Committee (FPAC) on a review of the recreation programming and how it affected the City’s budget. The Committee noted that programming decisions are policy decisions the Council needs to make regarding the level and quality of programming offered by the City, but from a budgetary perspective it would recommend that the programming bring in revenue that equals between 95 percent and 105 percent of direct expenses. It did not offer an opinion on related indirect expenses, the largest category being the two full- time staff members that oversee the recreation function. Following a Council discussion of FPAC’s recommendation, the Council directed staff to bring a discussion on Recreation Programming to a future work session.