My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
03-08-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2021 9:26:17 AM
Creation date
3/5/2021 9:25:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 16, 2021 11 <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott supported this recommendation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes agreed the City Planner should have a supervisory duties. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault suggested the City Planner position be bumped up one pay grade if <br />supervisory duties were required. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the City’s long term plan was to have a Community <br />Development Director, a City Planner and then another planner. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault stated this had been the structure previously, but the City had not <br />had a Community Development Director since 2016. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden recommended the pay grade only be bumped if a serious candidate were <br />to apply for the position. She supported the pay grade remaining at 15. She noted this individual <br />would not be supervising an entire department but rather would be overseeing one individual. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes questioned if supervisory roles were typically pay grade 16. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault reported this was not the case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes supported the City hiring at pay grade 16 in order to attract a higher <br />quality candidate for the City Planner position. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what would happen if a City Planner was hired and they did not <br />want the Community Development Director portion of the position. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the proposed pay grade for the City Planner position. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott proposed posting the position as pay grade 15 with supervisory duties with <br />the understanding the City could bump up the pay to page grade 16 if the candidate was deemed <br />worthy. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung discussed the work that was being done by Mr. Mrosla at this time <br />and questioned what the City needs. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented the City was looking for a City Planner. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if City Planners wanted to be Community Development Directors <br />or if this was a natural progression. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated this generally was the next <br />career step for many City Planners. He recommended the City hire a City Planner with <br />supervisory experience and have them grow into the Community Development Director position <br />in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden supported the position being posted at pay grade 15.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.