My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
04-12-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2021 2:52:22 PM
Creation date
4/8/2021 2:45:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 22, 2021 4 <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Jane Kansier said she would like the city attorney to respond to that <br />question. But she felt the Conditional Use Permit could limit the number of children. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant noted that the Fire Marshall would have to look at their plans and they may have to <br />make a change to the number of seats in the sanctuary in order to meet fire codes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked how many staff would be there on a daily basis. <br /> <br />Pastor Josh Krehbiel replied they currently have seven full time staff and they anticipate around <br />15 in the coming years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if they had any intention of putting a gym in the building. <br /> <br />Pastor Josh Krehbiel said it could be a potential use for space on the second floor, but they <br />anticipated it being small space utilized by the second floor tenants. <br /> <br />Pastor Katie Krehbiel added it wasn’t part of the current plan. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault asked what the different avenues are to move forward. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Jane Kansier responded the first step would be to amend the ordinance to <br />allow this use in the I-Flex District, keeping in mind that it wouldn’t be exclusive to this property. <br />After that is done, they would look at how this proposal fits into the new ordinance requirements. <br />For example, if they need a Conditional Use Permit, they would have to make application for that <br />and go through the public hearing process. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault said staff would want the City Council to weigh in on how the <br />zoning ordinance is changed first, and then address the planning application after that. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said he would see it as a Conditional Use Permit so it is only changed for the site <br />and not permitted throughout the entire District. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Jane Kansier clarified that the Zoning Ordinance has to be amended to <br />allow it in some way; either permitted outright, a Conditional Use Permit, or a Planned Unit <br />Development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the coffee shop and daycare would be automatically approved if <br />it’s not a Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Jane Kansier responded that the zoning ordinance currently lists <br />specifically what is permitted in the district. If they decide the church is permitted, they don’t <br />necessarily have to allow the accessory uses. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik cautioned that the traditional accessory uses for houses of worship have to <br />be allowed. Food shelves, fellowship, shelters would normally be considered as uses. A <br />commercial coffee shop wouldn’t normally fit into that category but a coffee station for fellowship <br />before and after service in a social situation would be a traditional accessory usage. He didn’t feel <br />making it a permitted use was how most communities deal with houses of worship because you
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.