My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
04-26-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2021 8:49:15 AM
Creation date
5/12/2021 8:48:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – APRIL 26, 2021 11 <br /> <br /> <br />He commented the City was proposing to shrink the shoulder on the east side, to shrink the <br />driving lanes and then to create a walking shoulder on the west side of the roadway. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant questioned what the shoulder width would be on the east side of the roadway. <br /> <br />Interim Public Works Director Swearingen indicated this would be up to the City but given the <br />steep slope of the land adjacent to the shoulder, staff was recommending the shoulder not be any <br />less than six feet. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant reported this would create a 12 foot shoulder on the west side of the roadway. <br /> <br />Interim Public Works Director Swearingen stated this was correct. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if it was traffic safety engineers that put the two options together <br />for the City to consider. <br /> <br />Interim Public Works Director Swearingen explained this was the case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott questioned if the assessment to the residents was the same between <br />Option 1 and Option 2. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant reported this was correct. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden commented she received calls and emails from residents that want the <br />trail as well as calls and emails from residents that do not want the trail. She stated she would be <br />willing to postpone action on this project in order to allow staff to speak with MSA staff to see if <br />the roadway can be narrowed and a trail created on the existing roadway that would meet <br />everyone’s needs. She indicated it was a goal to have trails throughout the entire City, but noted <br />the franchise fee was defeated by the residents. She reported the Council tries to partner with <br />people and that was how trails have been completed. She explained the City has worked to <br />complete a lot of trails in the past 10 years. She stated she did not feel guilty about installing a <br />shoulder trail if it was safe. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated he was surprised by the number of people who said a wider shoulder would <br />be sufficient and did not want the trail. He indicated he wanted the shoulder to be safe. He <br />explained if the Council had more questions that had to be brought to the MSA, he did not have a <br />problem postponing action on this item. He commented it was clear this roadway had to be <br />redone and was beyond its serviceable life. He stated he would rather delay action than rush the <br />project through without having an optimal decision. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes indicated staff needed direction on how to proceed for Area 1, whether <br />that be Option 1 or Option 2. She questioned if the Council could move Option 2 forward <br />directing staff to speak with the MSA to see if narrowing travel lanes and a shoulder trail option <br />was viable. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked how things were looking in terms of the project timeline. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.