Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 5, 2021 13 <br /> <br />Council reviewed the proposed amendment to the zoning code and directed staff to bring the draft <br />language to the Planning Commission for review. Staff has not received written comments from the <br />DNR as of April 28, 2021. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reviewed the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for <br />review: <br /> <br />General Findings: <br />1. The City of Arden Hills is proposing amendments to the language of Chapter 13 – Zoning <br />Code of the City Code. <br />2. The City of Arden Hills is proposing to permit accessory storage sheds within the required <br />structure setback from the ordinary high water level of up to 100 square feet in size and 8 <br />feet in height. <br />3. Amendments to the Shoreland Regulations require approval from the Minnesota DNR. <br />4. Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the <br />City Council <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier recommended approval of Planning Case 21-008 for a Zoning Code <br />Amendment to Chapter 13 of the Arden Hills City Code to permit accessory storage sheds of up to <br />100 square feet in size and 8 feet in height within the required structure setback from the ordinary <br />high water level as presented in the May 5, 2021 Report to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wicklund asked why the City wouldn’t want to model its Shoreland Ordinance <br />based off of neighboring cities, specifically Shoreview. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reported it was her understanding there was some review of other <br />ordinances. She noted the language that was used in this Ordinance was similar to the City of <br />Roseville. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber stated he was anticipating this code change, but questioned if 100 square <br />feet was adequate. He questioned why the City Council landed on this number. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jeffreys commented on the inconsistences between the shoreland regulations #1 <br />and #5. She questioned how the Commission should address this concern. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reported the Commission could set a minimum setback of 10 feet or <br />the Commission could eliminate this language altogether. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jeffreys recommended Shoreland Regulation #5 be eliminated. <br />