My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
05-24-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2021 7:25:33 PM
Creation date
6/23/2021 7:25:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MAY 24, 2021 7 <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier stated in September of 2020, Kye Samuelson (“Applicant”) <br />requested a Variance in order to construct an accessory structure near the shoreline of 3493 Siems <br />Court (“Subject Property”) within the Shore Impact Zone of Lake Johanna. The Applicant <br />requested a variance to build a 120 square foot accessory storage structure that encroached <br />eighteen (18) inches into the Shore Impact Zone of Lake Johanna. The proposed structure <br />exceeded the eight (8) foot height limitation at ten (10) feet, six (6) inches. The rationale for the <br />variance was that the structure would be used for the storage of modern day recreational water <br />equipment and the hardship was due to the rear yard topography. The Subject Property is zoned R- <br />1, Single Residential District, is located in the Shoreland Management District, and is guided as <br />Low Density Residential on the Land Use Plan. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reported at its October 7, 2020 meeting, the Planning Commission <br />voted to table the request to allow the Applicant to revise their plans to better conform to the <br />Shoreland Ordinance provisions. The Applicant took the Planning Commissions comments under <br />consideration and submitted revised plans for a smaller structure that would not encroach into the <br />Shore Impact Zone. The Applicant then proposed to construct an accessory structure that would <br />be nine and a half (9.5) feet tall and ninety-three and a half (93.5) square feet in size. However, <br />the proposed structure still required a variance due to the proposed height and area that exceeded <br />current ordinance standards. At its December 9, 2020 meeting the Planning Commission reviewed <br />and discussed the updated application. The Planning Commission voted 4-3 to approve the <br />planning case. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier commented at its January 11, 2021 meeting the City Council <br />reviewed Planning Case 20-017. The City Council voted unanimously to table this planning case <br />to allow them to review the existing accessory structure size standards for the Shoreland District. <br />The Applicant signed a 6-month Extension Form, requiring the City Council to take action on the <br />variance request by July 12, 2021. At its February 16, 2021 meeting the City Council discussed <br />increasing the permitted size of accessory structures within the Ordinary High Water Level <br />(OHWL) setback. The City Council directed staff to draft ordinance language to increase the size <br />of accessory structures located within the OHWL setback. The City Council did not support <br />increase the height of accessory structures located within the OHWL setback. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier explained following this meeting, staff drafted ordinance language <br />and sent the language to the DNR for review. At its April 19, 2021 Work Session, the City <br />Council reviewed the proposed amendment to the zoning code and directed staff to bring the draft <br />language to the Planning Commission for review. Staff received written comments from the DNR <br />prior to the Planning Commission meeting. A full evaluation of the proposal was presented to the <br />Planning Commission on May 5, 2021. At this meeting, the Planning Commission voted to <br />approve Planning Case 21-008 with some amendments. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier stated during the May 5, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting, a <br />resident noted that the classification of Lake Johanna in the Arden Hills City Code as a general <br />development lake is inconsistent with the classification of Lake Johanna on the Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resource’s website as a recreational development lake. Since this meeting, <br />staff has been in contact with the DNR to discuss this inconsistency. The DNR noted that this <br />inconsistency was identified in 1984 and the City of Arden Hills passed a resolution requesting <br />the DNR to change their classification to Lake Johanna to a general development lake to match
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.