My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-21-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
05-17-21-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2021 8:49:53 AM
Creation date
7/1/2021 8:49:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - MAY 17, 2021 2 <br />clinic on Lot 2, but the clinic chose not to build on the site. The property is currently zoned B-2 <br />(General Business District), which permits financial institutions & services as well as offices. The <br />applicant is anticipating a total of 12 full-time employees at the site with 9-5 office hours. The <br />access point to the parking lot will be located on the south side of the property. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier continued saying they will need to make a full application for a <br />Planned Unit Development. In addition, a PUD would allow the Council to grant flexibility. <br />Current City Code states "at least fifty percent (50%) of the largest building on each site shall be <br />constructed at the front setback line." The applicant is requesting flexibility on this requirement, <br />as they are not proposing to place the building at either the 20-foot setback line from County Road <br />E or the setback line from the internal property line facing Arden Plaza. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier stated a building of this size requires one parking stall for every <br />250 square feet, for a total of 23 stalls. The Applicant is proposing 20 parking stalls, with proof of <br />parking for an additional 3 stalls. Based on preliminary landscaping plans, the Applicant will <br />likely meet all requirements. The Applicant is proposing two wall signs on the south and north <br />elevations of the building. Both proposed signs are less than 25 square feet in area which is <br />consistent with sign criteria. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier said the Applicant is requesting flexibility on building <br />transparency. City Code states that 50% of all first level building facades that front a public street <br />shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors. On the north elevation they are showing <br />37% of transparency. The second building requirement involves building materials. The City <br />Ordinance requires at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the exterior building materials be of <br />brick masonry, tile masonry, natural stone, decorative concrete plank, transparent glass or any <br />combination thereof. The majority of the proposed elevations will be constructed out of patterned <br />cement rainscreen, anchored stone masonry veneer, and transparent glass. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier noted the last piece of possible flexibility is pedestrian and bicycle <br />circulation. City Code requires a six-foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to or in the right-of-way. <br />There is an existing bituminous path from Walgreens to the access road to the west. An eight -foot <br />concrete sidewalk is on the west. The applicant would prefer to maintain the five-foot bituminous <br />pathway, rather than provide a six-foot concrete sidewalk. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier said discussion items for the Council include the items of potential <br />flexibility: parking requirements, front setback line, building elevations and building materials, <br />and pedestrian and bicycle circulation. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the north side of the building would be parallel with <br />Walgreens. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier said the north side of Walgreens is closer to the property line. The <br />proposed building is south of the storm water pond. <br />U + B Architecture & Design Representative Udris responded the existing biofiltration swale <br />on County Road E would remain and the building will be behind that. <br />Councilmember Holden asked what materials would be facing County Road E. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.