My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-21-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
05-17-21-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2021 8:49:53 AM
Creation date
7/1/2021 8:49:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 17, 2021 6 <br />numbers of people he counted crossing at the light during different time periods and felt most <br />students cross at the light. <br />Councilmember Scott agreed the old crosswalk markings should be removed. <br />Councilmember Holden suggested they make removal of the old crosswalk a part of the <br />approval. <br />Mr. Paquette said he could have it removed right away. <br />Mayor Grant asked how they could stop students parking on the west side from crossing where <br />they want. <br />Mr. Schwartz replied that it takes time and training but the kids will do what they tell them. <br />Unfortunately, it's more adults that cross there than students. He can get more firm with them. <br />Mr. Paquette added that at the last meeting they had with the State they thought it would be <br />another nine to 12 months before they would review it, and couldn't guarantee there would be a <br />sale. The school district would like to get the rest of the project done within their own property, <br />along with reroofing and residing the former bus garage and the parking lot cleaned up. <br />Councilmember Holden asked for an explanation of how much safer completing the project this <br />way would be versus with the State property. <br />Bolton and Menk Traffic Engineer Bongard said the average queue westbound into the site <br />during site observations was one or two vehicles and the maximum was five. From what they see <br />it is functioning well and the patrol officer on site is optimistic about how traffic is moving. <br />Relocating the access further to the west on the State site was the preferred option, but with the <br />current locations with the driveways offset makes for a little uncomfortableness for people trying <br />to turn left from the west to east because of the overlap. Eastbound into the site will be cleaner <br />with dedicated right and left turn lanes. After revisiting options after receiving the news on the <br />State site they feel the current proposal is the best option. <br />Councilmember Holden wondered if it was worth making this change now or wait until they <br />acquire the State property and do it right for the long term. <br />Mayor Grant said if they could educate the kids to use the appropriate crossing, then why would <br />they not wait to buy the property from the State. <br />Mr. Paquette responded that there is no guarantee that they get the property, so they would be <br />back at square one. They would like to get the turn lane changes done, so if the City accepts the <br />plan they are putting forth they could stop pursuing the State land. <br />Mayor Grant asked if they would be losing parking stalls in the general area. <br />Bolton & Menk Traffic Engineer Bongard said he didn't have an exact answer but he will <br />quantify the parking counts when they come back with a full plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.