My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-21-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
07-12-21-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2021 10:45:34 AM
Creation date
7/13/2021 1:46:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION—JULY 12, 2021 2 <br /> discussed by the Council that two Chapters of the city code be amended. Those applicable <br /> Chapters and Sections are as follows: <br /> • Municipal Code Chapter 4—Animals and Pets <br /> o Amend - Section 400.01, Definitions <br /> o Add - Section 410.01 Subd. 3, Chickens License <br /> • Zoning Code Chapter 1325 —General Regulations <br /> o Amend — Section 1325.07 Subd. 7.A., Location for Buildings Housing Farm <br /> Animals <br /> Senior Planner Jagoe explained regarding coop setbacks, the general agreement of the Council <br /> was to include language similar to the City of Lakeville which was "The coop and run shall be <br /> located closer to the principal dwelling upon the property to which the administrative permit is <br /> issued than any other residential dwelling on an abutting property." The Council should discuss <br /> further if there is a preference to add language more specific to require a license holder to <br /> maintain a minimum setback. Additionally, there was deliberation at the work session on size of <br /> the coop and should this structure count towards the maximum number of accessory structures. <br /> There seemed to be general agreement that the coop should count as an accessory structure, but no <br /> limitations (i.e. minimum or maximum) were set for size. These are two areas that the Council <br /> may want to discuss further in review of draft ordinance language. <br /> Senior Planner Jagoe reported otherwise, the draft ordinance language presented includes the <br /> consensus of comments from the January work session. This is the first ordinance presented to the <br /> Council for review. Staff is seeking direction on draft language and next steps. It should be noted <br /> that an ordinance amendment to the Zoning Code does require a public hearing. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned what the difference was between a run and a pen. <br /> Senior Planner Jagoe stated a run and a pen were the same term. <br /> Further discussion ensured regarding the minimum size for a run/pen and exercise yard. <br /> Mayor Grant reported he would like to see the Council be specific as to what the size of the run <br /> in order to keep the pen humane. He noted the minimum size at this time was 30 square feet for <br /> three birds. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked how the City defined an exercise yard. <br /> Senior Planner Jagoe reported an exercise yard was a fenced in area for birds to be in when <br /> supervised. <br /> Councilmember Holden indicated this would allow for fenced in back yards to serve as exercise <br /> yards. <br /> Mayor Grant recommended the Council define how much space is required within the exercise <br /> yard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.