Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Geotechnical Report <br />Arden Oaks Street Improvements <br />Arden Hills, Minnesota <br />WSB Project No. 014297-000 Page 5 <br />4. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />4.1 Discussion <br />Based on our borings it is our opinion that the proposed watermain and pavement can generally be <br />supported on the soils encountered in the borings. However, soft sandy lean clay soils should be <br />anticipated during construction and a partial removal and replacement maybe necessary. <br /> <br />Also, the soils within the pavement subgrade consist mainly of lean clay soils, which are frost susceptible. <br />Consideration should be given to partially subcutting these soils and replacing with a non-frost <br />susceptible granular fill to reduce the potential frost heave below the pavement section. <br /> <br /> <br />4.2 Watermain Utilities <br />Invert elevations are anticipated to be within 8 feet of existing grades and we anticipate the subgrade <br />soils for the utilities will consist chiefly of sandy lean clay. If the clayey soils are soft or become soft it may <br />be necessary to perform a partial subcut and replacement. Where soft unstable soils are encountered at <br />invert grade, subexcavation of these materials to a depth of 1 to 2 feet and replacement with a coarse <br />sand or gravel is recommended. Underground utilities are expected to be installed by backhoes <br />completing the excavations and placing pipe and backfills. Soil compactors should be used to compact <br />the fill in thin even lifts to the specified densities. <br /> <br />4.3 Backfill and Fill Selection and Compaction <br />It is our opinion the onsite non-organic soils may be reused as backfill and fill provided they are moisture <br />conditioned and can be compacted to their specified densities. Any wet soils excavated would need to be <br />dried before reuse as an engineered fill. Backfills with cobbles larger than six inches (6”) should not <br />come in contact with utilities. We recommend that soils be moisture conditioned to meet compaction <br />specifications as determined from their standard Proctor tests (ASTM D-698). The fill should be spread in <br />thin lifts (8 to 10 inches depending on compaction equipment) to allow for full depth compaction. Table 2 <br />indicates the recommended compaction levels. <br /> <br />Table 2: Recommended Level of Compaction for Backfill and Fill <br />Area Percent of Standard Proctor <br />Maximum Dry Density <br />Pavement: Within 3 feet of top of subgrade <br /> Within 3 foot perimeter of structures such <br /> as manholes <br />100 <br />Pavement: Greater than 3 feet below top of subgrade 95 <br />Utility Trench (unless within 3 feet of pavement <br />subgrade) <br />95 <br />Landscaping (non-structural) 90 <br /> <br />4.4 Dewatering <br />Based on the results of our soil borings and the proposed construction, dewatering is not anticipated. <br /> <br />4.5 Pavement Areas <br />After removing the existing pavement sections and backfilling the utilities, the final subgrade should have <br />proper stability within three vertical feet of grading grade (grade which contacts the bottom of the <br />aggregate base). This will generally be achieved in fill areas with proper compaction of embankment <br />materials and in cut areas through proper subgrade preparation. The stability of the pavement subgrade <br />should be evaluated using the test roll procedure (MnDOT 2111), except a fully loaded tandem axle dump <br />truck or a full water truck should be utilized for the proof roll. If unstable soils are found under the test roll, <br />DRAFT REPORT <br />7-8-2021