My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
08-09-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2021 8:38:27 AM
Creation date
8/9/2021 8:35:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – JULY 12, 2021 4 <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden commented her only other concern was with how the properties in the <br />southwest portion of the City would be able to support chickens if they already have a detached <br />garage, and a shed on their property. She anticipated language could be written to allow residents <br />with a single car detached garage and a shed to also have a chicken coop. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant recommended that this language apply to all neighborhoods in the City and not just <br />the southwest portion of Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden suggested this language apply to properties in Arden Hills that have a <br />single car detached garage and storage shed with the maximum allowed square footage being 720 <br />square feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes recommended a license be required in order to allow the City to have <br />the ability to revoke the chicken keeping license if the property owner was not following all rules <br />and regulations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if property owners would be given 10 days to bring the property <br />into compliance, like with other code enforcement issues. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault reported the City would have to give them some amount of time to <br />remedy the situation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden recommended that coops be removed if the property owner was no <br />longer keeping chickens. She asked if the City was going to require property owners to receive <br />neighbor consent. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated this was a recommendation from the urban recommendations. <br />She suggested the City manage this process so as to not create additional friction between <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented there was value in neighbors establishing relationships with their <br />neighbors as well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott agreed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes indicated this was a tough situation. She discussed the issues her <br />neighborhood has had with unruly dogs and how the neighbors have had to work it out noting <br />somethings things get tense. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault stated the Council would have to consider how the City defines <br />neighbors and if this includes just the houses on each side and directly behind. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden supported this definition. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes agreed, especially if the property owner was required to have 100% <br />consent. She commented the Council may want to see what other cities require for consent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.