Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – AUGUST 23, 2021 7 <br /> <br />planning case review it was discovered that there was a discrepancy between the City’s shoreland <br />lake classification for Lake Johanna and Little Johanna from the designation of the Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Upon further research it was determined that action the <br />City Council had taken in May 1985 approving Resolution 85-22 was never formally processed <br />and approved by the DNR. This resolution had either not been submitted to the DNR or was <br />misplaced in processing on their end. The formal request of Resolution 85-22 to the DNR was for <br />shoreland reclassification of Lake Johanna, Little Johanna Lake, and Karth Lake from <br />Recreational Development to General Development. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe explained this past month City Staff contacted Dan Scollan, East Metro <br />Area Hydrologist with the DNR, regarding next steps and available options for proceeding with <br />Resolution 85-22. Mr. Scollan had indicated that the DNR had reviewed the 1984/85 <br />documentation and would proceed with approval of Resolution 85-22 as submitted. Their decision <br />in support of the reclassifications is the result of the lake classification factors having not <br />appreciably changed since 1985. Looking at all of the classification criteria holistically, the DNR <br />still agreed with the City’s reasoning presented in 1985 and concurred that the area development <br />is still consistent with the 1985 Council request as outlined. At the June 7, 2021, City Council <br />Special Work Session, staff was given direction to submit Resolution 85-22 to the DNR as <br />approved on May 13, 1985. This action necessitated an ordinance amendment to Section 1330.02 <br />Subd. 1, Classification of Lakes to classify Little Johanna as General Development. Staff <br />commented further on the request and recommended the Council hold a public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung indicated this item was taking the actions made in 1985 and making <br />them correct. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe reported this was the case, noting this was a housekeeping matter. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. <br /> <br />With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. <br /> <br />E. Planning Case 21-016 – Site Plan Review – 3900 Bethel Drive – Bolton & <br />Menk on behalf of Bethel University <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe stated Bethel University was approved a Conditional Use Permit <br />Amendment on May 3, 2021 for stadium field upgrades which included the addition of a new <br />track around it and practice fields to be converted into multi-purpose fields in the southern <br />quadrant of their main campus at 3900 Bethel Drive. The CUP Amendment application noted that <br />Bethel University was proposing changes to the scoreboard. Conditions of the CUP Amendment <br />approval were that a separate permit shall be required for the scoreboard and that prior to <br />replacement of sound system, Bethel University would be required to submit new sound system <br />plans to the City Council for approval. The Applicant is proposing to convert the existing <br />electronic scoreboard to a LED/Video capable scoreboard with a sound system fully contained <br />within the accessory structure. Staff reviewed the Site Data and Plan Evaluation in further detail <br />with the Council and recommended the Council hold a public hearing. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant questioned if the distance to the property line was to the railroad.