Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 13 <br /> <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe deferred this question to the applicant. <br /> <br />Rachel Gilbert, representative for Bethel University, clarified the sign was lit by floodlights and <br />was not lit internally. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber questioned if a signed agreement with New Perspectives would be <br />sufficient to legally prohibit them from installing a monument sign. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe stated this could be confirmed with the City Attorney prior to the City <br />Council meeting. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Wicklund asked why the north side has been chosen for the monument sign. <br /> <br />Ms. Gilbert discussed the property lines and noted the road was not centered within Outlot A <br />and for this reason, the sign would only fit on the north side. She indicated the sign would not <br />impede sight lines any further than the trees that were in this location. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Wicklund opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Wicklund invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />There being no comment Acting Chair Wicklund closed the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber moved and Commissioner Subramanian seconded a motion to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case 21-020 for a Planned Unit Development <br />Amendment at 2 Pine Tree Drive and Outlot A based on the findings of fact and the <br />submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 8, 2021, report to the <br />Planning Commission. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />E. Planning Case 21-023; City of Arden Hills – 3588 Ridgewood Road – Public Hearing <br />Not Required <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe stated earlier this year, the City was contacted by two interested parties <br />regarding purchasing the City owned parcel at 3588 Ridgewood Road. City Staff had several <br />internal discussions about how the City acquired the lot and development logistics in adherence <br />to city code requirements. City Staff was unable to obtain title information from the Ramsey <br />County Recorder’s Office document search for the subject parcel. Therefore, the City Attorney <br />was directed to begin the process of a title search in order to obtain an Owners/Encumbrances <br />Report. On August 6th, the City received the completed title report which confirmed that the <br />property came from State through County as part of turnback of the old Snelling Avenue corridor <br />ROW. There are no deed restrictions prohibiting the City from selling this parcel. Ramsey <br />County records show the value of the parcel at $68,400. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe reported the lot is considered a nonconforming lot. The R-1 District <br />requires a 14,000 square foot lot with 95 ft. width and 130 ft. depth. This irregular shaped lot is <br />about 13,500 square feet. The City Attorney has confirmed that a variance for the building of a