Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 16 <br /> <br />told this was an unbuildable lot and had oriented their homes with this information in mind. She <br />feared that there had been too many changes at the staff level and there had not been proper <br />follow through for this property. She indicated she would like to see this lot remain as is. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Wicklund closed the meeting for public comments. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Wicklund explained the residents have stated the City of Arden Hills made the <br />adjacent residents believe this lot was unbuildable and these residents made investment decisions <br />for their homes and driveways based on this. He questioned what the Planning Commission <br />should do with this information. He asked if there was a way to subdivide the lot and split it into <br />two. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe commented the lot could not be split into two new lots of record because <br />the new lots would not meet the City’s standards. However, the neighbors could pursue a minor <br />subdivision and then combine the lot area with the adjacent parcels. <br /> <br />Commissioner Subramanian thanked the residents for coming forward and speaking to the <br />Commission regarding their concerns. He noted things have changed and the City is considering <br />selling this property. He asked if the property could be sold to the neighbors and it could be <br />divided. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe reported this may be possible by applying for a minor subdivision. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Wicklund stated he would be willing to make this a condition for approval of the <br />land sale. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe explained the Commission was being asked if the land sale was consistent <br />with the Comprehensive Plan. She reported a 60 day timeline was not in place for this Planning <br />Case and noted the Commission could table action on this item. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes indicated this was an unusual item that was only being reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission and would not move forward to the City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber commented this meant if the Planning Commission were to decline the <br />request, the sale would not go forward. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe reported this was the case noting the Commission would have to state <br />reasons for the denial. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber stated he would like staff to investigate if the City designated this land <br />park property with Ramsey County. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe commented she had not contacted the County. However, she noted a title <br />search was done and noted the land had no park land designation and there were no deed <br />restrictions on the sale of the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber indicated this was a very unfortunate situation for the neighbors. He was <br />of the opinion the land had to be sold with the understanding it was an unbuildable lot.