My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-21 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2021
>
09-08-21 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2021 9:06:58 AM
Creation date
10/7/2021 9:06:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 8, 2021 3 <br /> <br />Commissioner Jefferys questioned how the City would enforce the Ordinance and asked if the <br />Ramsey County Sheriff was aware of the chicken keeping requirements. She also inquired what <br />would happen if a neighbor were to move and new neighbors were to move into a home that did <br />not support the keeping of chickens. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe stated an animal control officer with the Sheriff’s Department would be <br />working with the City to enforce the Ordinance. In addition, code enforcement staff may have a <br />role and assist with enforcement complaints. She reported if a neighbor were to move, no <br />additional approval would be required. <br /> <br />Commissioner Subramanian asked if breeding of chickens would be allowed. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe explained breeding of chickens would not be allowed, but rather chickens <br />would be allowed as pets or for the laying of eggs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Subramanian stated it would be important for the City to be able to identify <br />avian flu symptoms and what rules would be in place to manage this situation. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe commented if there was a nuisance complaint regarding a health or odor <br />concern the City would respond. She reported as drafted the ordinance language did not require <br />proof of medical records. Further discussion ensued regarding how the City would inspect coops <br />upon receiving a complaint. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber questioned if the chickens would be expected to remain within the coop <br />or enclosed pen area. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe stated this was the case. She explained chickens would be allowed in an <br />exercise area only when supervised. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber inquired why the City was only allowing three chickens given the fact <br />these were social animals. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe commented this was a discussion held by the City Council and noted the <br />Commission could recommend this number be increased. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber stated he supported this number being increased to five. He questioned <br />how the chickens were to be disposed of. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Jagoe indicated the property owners would have to ensure the chickens were <br />disposed of properly and would not be allowed to slaughter the chickens on their property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber explained he did not support this recommendation. He anticipated that <br />once a chicken was euthanized at a vets office, it would no longer be edible. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman reported his granddaughter had chickens in Mendota Heights and <br />noted it was important that the coop be properly built in order to keep out foxes, coyotes and <br />other predators. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.