My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
10-11-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2021 1:26:17 PM
Creation date
10/7/2021 1:22:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 <br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Fisher stated there would be no additional charge as they were planning to stick to the <br />original 40-foot footprint, unless there were some utilities work that would require it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes wondered if the public should be able to comment on all three designs. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant thought they should decide on a preferred design. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes felt Option 3 was the best design with the walkway on the east. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott felt Option 3 with walk on the west. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant liked Option 3 but was undecided which side he preferred for the walkway. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung also liked Option 3 with the walkway on the east due to fewer <br />driveway crossings. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden was agreeable to Option 2 or 3, but liked the west side for the walkway. <br /> <br />Mr. Fisher will coordinate a public meeting and present all three options for review and <br />comment. Feedback received from the meeting will be presented to Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden requested they provide artist rendering drawings at the public meeting <br />in addition to the cross-section drawings. <br /> <br />B. State of the City Update <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault stated that the State of the City is currently set as in in-person event <br />at the Marsden Room in the Ramsey County Public Works building. He asked if Council would <br />like to keep it as an in-person event. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott said he would like to plan for in-person but be flexible. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes agreed to leave it live because of the date coming up soon. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung said he was torn on which path to choose. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault noted there should discuss and assign topics and reviewed the <br />current list. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes felt they only needed Arden Hills Foundation under City Points of <br />Interest. She would like to add a section about trails; expense and how Council sets priorities. <br />She felt they didn’t need a litigation update, but they should talk about TCAAP. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.