My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
10-11-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2021 1:26:17 PM
Creation date
10/7/2021 1:22:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 <br /> 5 <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault noted that North Oaks has authorized their City Administrator to <br />enter in an agreement, Shoreview hadn’t taken it to their Council . He discussed the pros and cons <br />of the 3-1-1 voting proposal. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung said he was looking for consensus and liked the 1-1-1 option better. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant mentioned that in a 3-1-1 model, if Shoreview wanted to veto something they <br />could vote their 3 shares and the other two cities are outvoted. But an affirmative vote by <br />Shoreview would be the same as 1-1-1. He felt it basically gives Shoreview veto power. <br /> <br />Discussion continued regarding the voting preference. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault stated he was hearing a 1-1-1 preference and would take that to <br />Shoreview for consideration. He asked if they had a preference for or against an option for a non - <br />voting board member for Shoreview that would potentially give them an extra voice in <br />conversations instead of the 3-1-1 vote. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes suggested the Board have five members as presented but only one <br />voting member from each city. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden didn’t like the idea of a non-voting member. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung noted the non-voting member would still need to be an elected <br />official. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant directed staff to go forward with 1-1-1. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden thought it might look better for the legislative process to have a 1-1-1 <br />vote. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked if the fire department was seeking a financial source for the new <br />station. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault explained they are working with the three cities providing <br />background and statistics. The JPA could seek bonds or the cities could individually, as agreed to <br />by the board. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that if there was funding needed the board could decide how they <br />would want to raise funds. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault said they could add “unless otherwise agreed upon”. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holms asked if there might be other cities that would want to join the JDA.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.